Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1987 Jan;84(2):508-11.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.2.508.

East African cheetahs: evidence for two population bottlenecks?

Comparative Study

East African cheetahs: evidence for two population bottlenecks?

S J O'Brien et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Jan.

Abstract

A combined population genetic and reproductive analysis was undertaken to compare free-ranging cheetahs from east Africa (Acinonyx jubatus raineyi) with the genetically impoverished and reproductively impaired south African subspecies (Acinonyx jubatus jubatus). Like that of their south African counterparts, the quality of semen specimens from east African cheetahs was poor, with a low concentration of spermatozoa (25.3 X 10(6) per ejaculate) and a high incidence of morphological abnormalities (79%). From an electrophoretic survey of the products of 49 genetic loci in A. jubatus raineyi, two allozyme polymorphisms were detected; one of these, for a nonspecific esterase, shows an allele that is rare (less than 1% incidence) in south African specimens. Estimates of polymorphism (2-4%) and average heterozygosity (0.0004-0.014) affirm the cheetah as the least genetically variable felid species. The genetic distance between south and east African cheetahs was low (0.004), suggesting that the development of genetic uniformity preceded the recent geographic isolation of the subspecies. We propose that at least two population bottlenecks followed by inbreeding produced the modern cheetah species. The first and most extreme was ancient, possibly late Pleistocene (circa 10,000 years ago); the second was more recent (within the last century) and led to the south African populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1985;40(1-4):8-66 - PubMed
    1. Biol Reprod. 1986 Jun;34(5):949-59 - PubMed
    1. Biol Reprod. 1983 Nov;29(4):1019-25 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1985 Mar 22;227(4693):1428-34 - PubMed
    1. Genetics. 1978 Jul;89(3):583-90 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources