Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb;41(2):293-305.
doi: 10.1007/s00299-021-02800-7. Epub 2021 Oct 21.

Proteinase inhibitors in legume herbivore defense: from natural to genetically engineered protectants

Affiliations
Review

Proteinase inhibitors in legume herbivore defense: from natural to genetically engineered protectants

Mst Shamira Sultana et al. Plant Cell Rep. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Proteinase inhibitors (PIs) from legumes have the potential for use as protectants in response to pests and pathogens. Legumes have evolved PIs that inhibit digestive proteinases upon herbivory resulting in delayed development, deformities, and reduced fertility of herbivorous insects. Legume PIs (serine proteinase inhibitors and cysteine proteinase inhibitors) have been overexpressed in plants to confer plant protection against herbivores. Recently, the co-expression of multiple PIs in transgenic plants enhanced host defense over single PI expression, i.e., in an additive fashion. Therefore, a synthetic PI could conceivably be designed using different inhibitory domains that may provide multifunctional protection. Little attention has yet given to expanding PI gene repertoires to improve PI efficacy for targeting multiple proteinases. Also, PIs have been shown to play an important role in response to abiotic stresses. Previously published papers have presented several aspects of strategic deployment of PIs in transgenic plants, which is the focus of this review by providing a comprehensive update of the recent progress of using PIs in transgenic plants. We also emphasize broadening the potential usefulness of PIs and their future direction in research, which will likely result in a more potent defense against herbivores.

Keywords: Chimeric synthetic proteins; Chymotrypsin inhibitors; Defoliating insects; Digestive proteinases; Host defense; Insect resistance; Plant protection; Transgenic plants; Trypsin inhibitors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abdeen A, Virgos A, Olivella E, Villanueva J, Aviles X, Gabarra R, Prat S (2005) Multiple insect resistance in transgenic tomato plants over-expressing two families of plant proteinase inhibitors. Plant Mol Biol 57(2):189–202 - PubMed
    1. Agrawal AA (1998) Induced responses to herbivory and increased plant performance. Science 279(5354):1201–1202 - PubMed
    1. Atkinson HJ, Urwin PE, Hansen E, McPherson MJ (1995) Designs for engineered resistance to root-parasitic nematodes. Trends Biotechnol 13(9):369–374
    1. Azzouz H, Cherqui A, Campan EDM, Rahbe Y, Duport G, Jouanin L, Kaiser L, Giordanengo P (2005) Effects of plant protease inhibitors, oryzacystatin I and soybean–Birk inhibitor, on the aphid Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Homoptera, Aphididae) and its parasitoid Aphelinus abdominalis (Hymenoptera, Aphelinidae). J Insect Physiol 51(1):75–86 - PubMed
    1. Bateman KS, James MNG (2011) Plant protein proteinase inhibitors: structure and mechanism of inhibition. Curr Protein Pept Sci 12(5):341–347

LinkOut - more resources