High rate of incisional hernia observed after mass closure of burst abdomen
- PMID: 34674087
- DOI: 10.1007/s10029-021-02523-4
High rate of incisional hernia observed after mass closure of burst abdomen
Abstract
Purpose: This study investigated the long-term development of incisional hernia after implementation of a standardized surgical treatment strategy for burst abdomen in abdominal midline incisions with a continuous mass closure technique.
Methods: The study was a single-center, observational study evaluating all patients treated for burst abdomen between June 2014 and April 2019 with a long-term follow-up in October 2020. In June 2014, a standardized surgical treatment for burst abdomen involving a monofilament, slowly absorbable suture in a continuous mass-closure stitch with large bites of 3 cm and small steps of 5 mm was introduced. The occurrence of incisional hernia was investigated and defined as a radiological-, clinical-, or intraoperative finding of a hernia in the abdominal midline incision at follow-up.
Results: Ninety-four patients suffered from burst abdomen during the study period. Eighty patients were eligible for follow-up. The index surgery prior to burst abdomen was an emergency laparotomy in 78% (62/80) of the patients. Nineteen patients died within the first 30 postoperative days and 61 patients were available for further analysis. The long-term incisional hernia rate was 33% (20/61) with a median follow-up of 17 months (min 4, max 67 months).
Conclusion: Standardized surgery for burst abdomen with a mass-closure technique using slow absorbable running suture results in high rates of long-term incisional hernias, comparable to the hernia rates reported in the literature among this group of patients.
Keywords: Abdomen burst; Incisional hernia; Laparotomy; Long-term risk; Mass closure; Midline incision.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Webster C, Neumayer L, Smout R et al (2003) Prognostic models of abdominal wound dehiscence after laparotomy. J Surg Res 109:130–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-4804(02)00097-5 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bloemen A, Van Dooren P, Huizinga BF et al (2011) Randomized clinical trial comparing polypropylene or polydioxanone for midline abdominal wall closure. Br J Surg 98:633–639. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7398 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kenig J, Richter P, Lasek A et al (2014) The efficacy of risk scores for predicting abdominal wound dehiscence: a case-controlled validation study. BMC Surg 14:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-65 - DOI
-
- Meena K, Ali S, Chawla AS et al (2013) A prospective study of factors influencing wound dehiscence after midline laparotomy. Surg Sci 04:354–358. https://doi.org/10.4236/ss.2013.48070 - DOI
-
- Kim JJ, Liang MK, Subramanian A et al (2011) Predictors of relaparotomy after nontrauma emergency general surgery with initial fascial closure. Am J Surg 202:549–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.06.023 ([Internet] Elsevier Inc) - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous