Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Dec;10(4):288-299.
doi: 10.1007/s13668-021-00379-9. Epub 2021 Oct 21.

How Differences in the Disease Process of the COVID-19 Pandemic Pose Challenges to the Delivery of Critical Care Nutrition

Affiliations
Review

How Differences in the Disease Process of the COVID-19 Pandemic Pose Challenges to the Delivery of Critical Care Nutrition

Mohamed Eisa et al. Curr Nutr Rep. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose of review: The COVID-19 pandemic is a unique disease process that has caused unprecedented challenges for intensive care specialists. The hyperinflammatory hypermetabolic nature of the disease and the complexity of its management create barriers to the delivery of nutritional therapy. This review identifies the key differences which characterize this pandemic from other disease processes in critical illness and discusses alternative strategies to enhance success of nutritional support.

Recent findings: Prolonged hyperinflammation, unlike any previously described pattern of response to injury, causes metabolic perturbations and deterioration of nutritional status. High ventilatory demands, hypercoagulation with the risk of bowel ischemia, and threat of aspiration in patients with little or no pulmonary reserve, thwart initial efforts to provide early enteral nutrition (EN). The obesity paradox is invalidated, tolerance of EN is limited, intensivists are reluctant to add supplemental parenteral nutrition (PN), and efforts to give sufficient nutritional therapy remain a low priority. The nature of the disease and difficulties providing traditional critical care nutrition lead to dramatic deterioration of nutritional status. Institutions should not rely on insufficient gastric feeding alone but focus instead on redoubling efforts to provide postpyloric deep duodenal/jejunal EN or re-examine the role of supplemental PN in this population of patients with such severe critical illness.

Keywords: COVID-19 disease; Coronavirus; Enteral nutrition; Malnutrition; Nutritional therapy; Parenteral nutrition; SARS-CoV-2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Classification of SARS-CoV-2 Virus (Figure adapted with permission from H A. Aboubakr et al. and Galanopoulos M et al. – references [3, 4]). Legend: SARS severe acute respiratory syndrome, MERS Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome, SARS-CoV-2 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The Obesity Paradox (figure reproduced with permission from D L. Davenport et al. – reference [14])
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Prioritization of responsibilities in the complex management of the critically ill patient with COVID-19 disease. Legend: PPE personalized protective equipment, Rx therapy
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Comparison of the metabolic response to injury in COVID-19 disease (a) (figure adapted with permission from J Whittle et al. – reference 18) to previously described models: Cuthbertson Ebb/Flow (b) (figure reproduced with permission from JS Carson et al. – reference [19]). SIRS/CARS (c) and PICS (d) (figures reproduced from B Mathias et al. – reference [20]). Legend: SIRS systemic inflammatory response syndrome, CARS compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome, PICS persistent inflammatory catabolism syndrome
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Pattern of antioxidant micronutrients in response to metabolic stress (figure reproduced with permission from MM Berger – reference [39]). Legend: AOX antioxidant
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Choice of institutional strategies to provide optimal nutritional therapy in COVID-19 disease: early initiation of small bowel feeding (a) (reproduced with permission from Chris Gralapp) versus gastric feeding with early supplementation of parenteral nutrition (b) (reproduced from Maria Palma – reference [68])

Similar articles

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as:

• Of importance
    1. • Martindale R, Patel JJ, Taylor B, Arabi YM, Warren M, McClave SA. Nutrition therapy in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2020;44(7):1174–1184. This guidance was the first nutritional guidance from ASPEN for critically ill COVID-19 patients. - PMC - PubMed
    1. • McClave SA, Taylor BE, Martindale RG, et al. Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.). JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016;40(2):159–211. (This is the most recent guideline from ASPEN and SCCM on provision and assessment of nutrition in the critically ill patients. The COVID-19 guidance (reference 1) was mainly based on this guidline.) - PubMed
    1. Aboubakr HA, Sharafeldin TA, Goyal SM. Stability of SARS-CoV-2 and other coronaviruses in the environment and on common touch surfaces and the influence of climatic conditions: A review. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2021;68(2):296–312. doi: 10.1111/tbed.13707. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Galanopoulos M, Gkeros F, Doukatas A, et al. COVID-19 pandemic: pathophysiology and manifestations from the gastrointestinal tract. World J Gastroenterol. 2020;26(31):4579–4588. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i31.4579. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Petersen E, Koopmans M, Go U, et al. Comparing SARS-CoV-2 with SARS-CoV and influenza pandemics. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(9):e238–e244. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30484-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed