Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Mar;92(3):355-364.
doi: 10.1111/ans.17262. Epub 2021 Oct 22.

Defining the learning curve of transanal total mesorectal excision: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Steve Yee Chiang Lau  1   2 , Kay Tai Choy  3 , Tze Wei Wilson Yang  4 , Alexander Heriot  5   6   7 , Satish K Warrier  4   5   6   7 , Glenn D Guest  1   2 , Joseph C Kong  5   6   7
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Defining the learning curve of transanal total mesorectal excision: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Steve Yee Chiang Lau et al. ANZ J Surg. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) represents a novel approach to rectal dissection. Although many structured training programs have been developed worldwide to assist surgeons in implementing this new technique, the learning curve (LC) of taTME has yet to be conclusively defined. This is particularly important given the concerns regarding the complication profile and oncological safety of taTME. The aim of this review was to provide an up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis of the LC for taTME, comparing the difference of outcomes between the LC and after learning curve (ALC) groups.

Methods: An up-to-date systematic review was performed on the available literature between 2010-2020 on PubMed, EMBASE, Medline and Cochrane Library databases. All studies comparing taTME procedures before and after LC were analysed.

Results: Seven retrospective studies of prospectively collected databases were included, comparing 333 (51.0%) patients in the LC group and 320 (49.0%) patients in the ALC group. There was a significantly reduced number of adverse intra-operative events, anastomotic leaks and improved quality of mesorectal excision in the ALC group.

Conclusion: This review shows that there is a significant improvement in clinical outcomes between the LC and ALC groups which supports the need for careful mastery and ongoing technical refinement during the LC in taTME. This procedure should be performed on a subset of carefully selected patients in the hands of experienced and well-trained teams dedicated to ongoing audit.

Keywords: learning curve; proctorship; transanal TME.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Adamina M, Buchs NC, Penna M, Hompes R. St. Gallen consensus on safe implementation of transanal total mesorectal excision. Surg. Endosc. 2018; 32: 1091-103.
    1. Atallah SB, DuBose AC, Burke JP et al. Uptake of transanal total mesorectal excision in North America: initial assessment of a structured training program and the experience of delegate surgeons. Dis. Colon Rectum. 2017; 60: 1023-31.
    1. Targarona EM, Balague C, Pernas JC et al. Can we predict immediate outcome after laparoscopic rectal surgery? Multivariate analysis of clinical, anatomic, and pathologic features after 3-dimensional reconstruction of the pelvic anatomy. Ann. Surg. 2008; 247: 642-9.
    1. Shin DW, Shin JY, Oh SJ et al. The prognostic value of circumferential resection margin involvement in patients with extraperitoneal rectal cancer. Am. Surg. 2016; 82: 348-55.
    1. Atallah S, Sylla P, Wexner S. Norway versus the Netherlands: will taTME stand the test of time?. Tech Coloproctol. 2019; 28: 803-6.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources