Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 15;114(2):69-79.
doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1960. Epub 2021 Oct 21.

Interpregnancy interval and prevalence of selected birth defects: A multistate study

Rebecca F Liberman  1 , Dominique Heinke  1 , Julie M Petersen  2 , Samantha E Parker  2 , Eirini Nestoridi  1 , Alissa R Van Zutphen  3 , Wendy N Nembhard  4 , Glenda M Ramirez  5 , Mary K Ethen  6 , Tri Tran  7 , Russell S Kirby  8 , Kelly D Getz  9 , Amy E Nance  10 , Mahsa M Yazdy  1 ; National Birth Defects Prevention Network
Affiliations

Interpregnancy interval and prevalence of selected birth defects: A multistate study

Rebecca F Liberman et al. Birth Defects Res. .

Abstract

Background: Both short and long interpregnancy intervals (IPIs) have been associated with adverse birth outcomes. We undertook a multistate study to describe the prevalence of selected birth defects by IPI.

Methods: We obtained data from nine population-based state birth defects registries for singleton live births in 2000-2009 among mothers with a previous live birth identified through birth certificates. IPI was calculated as the difference between prior birthdate and start of the current pregnancy (conception date). We estimated prevalence of selected defects per 10,000 live births and prevalence ratios (PRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) overall and stratified by maternal age at previous birth and race/ethnicity. Primary analyses focused on short IPI < 6 months and long IPI ≥ 60 months compared to 18-23 months (referent). Sensitivity analyses limited to active-surveillance states and those with<10% missing IPI.

Results: Among 5,147,962 eligible births, 6.3% had short IPI while 19.8% had long IPI. Compared to referent, prevalence with short IPI was elevated for gastroschisis (3.7, CI: 3.0-4.5 vs. 2.0, CI: 1.6-2.4) and with both short and long IPI for tetralogy of Fallot (short: 3.4, 2.8-4.2 long: 3.8, 3.4-4.3 vs. 2.7, 2.3-3.2) and cleft lip ± palate (short: 9.9, 8.8-11.2 long: 9.2, 8.5-9.8 vs. 8.4, 7.6-9.2). Stratified analyses identified additional associations, including elevated prevalence of anencephaly with short IPI in younger mothers and limb defects with long IPI in those ages 25-34 at prior birth. Sensitivity analyses showed similar results.

Conclusion: In this population-based study, we observed increased prevalence of several birth defects with short and long IPI.

Keywords: birth defects; birth spacing; interpregnancy interval; long interpregnancy interval; short interpregnancy interval.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Ahrens, K. A., Nelson, H., Stidd, R. L., Moskosky, S., & Hutcheon, J. A. (2019). Short interpregnancy intervals and adverse perinatal outcomes in high-resource settings: An updated systematic review. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 33(1), O25-O47. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.12503
    1. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG). (2019). Obstetric care consensus No. 8 summary: Interpregnancy care. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 133(1), 220-225. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003026
    1. Bruinse, H. W., & van den Berg, H. (1995). Changes of some vitamin levels during and after normal pregnancy. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 61(1), 31-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-2243(95)02150-q
    1. Chen, I., Jhangri, G. S., & Chandra, S. (2014). Relationship between interpregnancy interval and congenital anomalies. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 210(6), 564.e1-564.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.02.002
    1. Conde-Agudelo, A., Rosas-Bermudez, A., & Kafury-Goeta, A. C. (2006). Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: A meta-analysis. JAMA, 295(15), 1809-1823. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.15.1809

LinkOut - more resources