Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 11;9(10):117.
doi: 10.3390/dj9100117.

Prevalence of Dental Malocclusions in Different Geographical Areas: Scoping Review

Affiliations

Prevalence of Dental Malocclusions in Different Geographical Areas: Scoping Review

Niccoló Cenzato et al. Dent J (Basel). .

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) considers malocclusion one of the most important oral health problems, after caries and periodontal disease. Its prevalence is highly variable and is estimated to be between 39% and 93% in children and adolescents. Due to the importance of malocclusions in dentistry, the aim of our review is to assess the frequency of malocclusions among different geographical regions. A literature research was performed through the Pubmed, Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, Open Grey and Cochrane Library databases. The "PRISMA" guidelines were used for the following review. Fourteen studies were analysed for this review. Class I was found most frequently, followed by class II and finally class III. Considering the other anomalies, crowding was one of the most frequent with a prevalence of up to 84%, followed by spacing, which reached a frequency of 60%. Prevalence of crossbite and openbite was quite variable, while the evaluation of deepbite revealed more uniform values. The prevalence varied widely for most of the types of malocclusion in relation to the different populations, which suggests a role of genetics and environmental influences, typical of each population in determining dental problems.

Keywords: angle classes; dental; geographical areas; malocclusion; prevalence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Literature search flowchart (PRISMA 2020).

References

    1. Dos Santos R.R., Nayme J.G., Garbin A.J., Saliba N., Garbin C.A., Moimaz S.A. Prevalence of malocclusion and related oral habits in 5-to 6-year-old children. Oral Health Prev. Dent. 2012;10:311–318. - PubMed
    1. Mtaya M., Brudvik P., Astrøm A.N. Prevalence of malocclusion and its relationship with socio- demographic factors, dental caries, and oral hygiene in 12- to 14-year-old Tanzanian schoolchildren. Eur. J. Orthod. 2009;31:467–476. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn125. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khan M., Fida M. Assessment of psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics. J. Coll. Physicians Surg. Pak. 2008;18:559–564. - PubMed
    1. Lew K.K., Foong W.C., Loh E. Malocclusion prevalence in an ethnic Chinese population. Aust. Dent. J. 1993;38:442–449. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1993.tb04759.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gelgör I.E., Karaman A.I., Ercan E. Prevalence of malocclusion among adolescents in central anatolia. Eur. J. Dent. 2007;1:125–131. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1698327. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types