Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 18;19(10):581.
doi: 10.3390/md19100581.

Investigation of Marine-Derived Natural Products as Raf Kinase Inhibitory Protein (RKIP)-Binding Ligands

Affiliations

Investigation of Marine-Derived Natural Products as Raf Kinase Inhibitory Protein (RKIP)-Binding Ligands

Shraddha Parate et al. Mar Drugs. .

Abstract

Raf kinase inhibitory protein (RKIP) is an essential regulator of the Ras/Raf-1/MEK/ERK signaling cascade and functions by directly interacting with the Raf-1 kinase. The abnormal expression of RKIP is linked with numerous diseases including cancers, Alzheimer's and diabetic nephropathy. Interestingly, RKIP also plays an indispensable role as a tumor suppressor, thus making it an attractive therapeutic target. To date, only a few small molecules have been reported to modulate the activity of RKIP, and there is a need to explore additional scaffolds. In order to achieve this objective, a pharmacophore model was generated that explores the features of locostatin, the most potent RKIP modulator. Correspondingly, the developed model was subjected to screening, and the mapped compounds from Marine Natural Products (MNP) library were retrieved. The mapped MNPs after ensuing drug-likeness filtration were escalated for molecular docking, where locostatin was regarded as a reference. The MNPs exhibiting higher docking scores than locostatin were considered for molecular dynamics simulations, and their binding affinity towards RKIP was computed via MM/PBSA. A total of five molecules revealed significantly better binding free energy scores than compared to locostatin and, therefore, were reckoned as hits. The hits from the present in silico investigation could act as potent RKIP modulators and disrupt interactions of RKIP with its binding proteins. Furthermore, the identification of potent modulators from marine natural habitat can act as a future drug-discovery source.

Keywords: RKIP; binding free energy; marine natural products; molecular docking; molecular dynamics simulations; pharmacophore modeling; virtual screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Chemical structures of small molecule RKIP modulators identified to date.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The in silico workflow depicting the sequence of computational techniques for identification of RKIP modulators.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Auto-pharmacophore model exploiting locostatin. (A) Pharmacophore features demonstrated by locostatin- HBA (hydrogen bond acceptor), HyP (hydrophobic) and RA (ring aromatic). (B) Interfeature distance between the mapped features of locostatin.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation analyses plots demonstrating the (A) backbone root mean square deviation (RMSD), (B) backbone root mean square fluctuation (RMSF), (C) binding free energy (∆Gbind) values and (D) potential energy of the reference (REF) compound, locostatin and identified hits with RKIP.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Binding mode of reference (REF) compound, locostatin and identified hits in the ligand-binding pocket of RKIP.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The three-dimensional (3D) intermolecular interactions of (A) reference (REF) compound, locostatin and the (BF) identified hits with the key residues of RKIP. The hydrogen bonding interactions are displayed as dashed green lines.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Energy decomposition of individual residues in RKIP contributing to the total binding free energy of (A) Locostatin, (B) HIT1, (C) HIT2, (D) HIT3, (E) HIT4 and (F) HIT5, computed by MM/PBSA.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Al-Mulla F., Bitar M.S., Taqi Z., Yeung K.C. RKIP: Much more than Raf Kinase inhibitory protein. J. Cell. Physiol. 2013;228:1688–1702. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24335. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Keller E.T., Fu Z., Brennan M. The role of Raf kinase inhibitor protein (RKIP) in health and disease. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2004;68:1049–1053. - PubMed
    1. Parate S., Rampogu S., Lee G., Hong J.C., Lee K.W. Exploring the Binding Interaction of Raf Kinase Inhibitory Protein With the N-Terminal of C-Raf Through Molecular Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulation. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021;8:1. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.655035. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gabriela-Freitas M., Pinheiro J., Raquel-Cunha A., Cardoso-Carneiro D., Martinho O. Rkip as an inflammatory and immune system modulator: Implications in cancer. Biomolecules. 2019;9:769. doi: 10.3390/biom9120769. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lorenz K., Lohse M.J., Quitterer U. Protein kinase C switches the Raf kinase inhibitor from Raf-1 to GRK-2. Nature. 2003;426:574–579. doi: 10.1038/nature02158. - DOI - PubMed