Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2021 Nov;22(11):1618-1631.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00522-2. Epub 2021 Oct 19.

A prospective prostate cancer screening programme for men with pathogenic variants in mismatch repair genes (IMPACT): initial results from an international prospective study

Elizabeth K Bancroft  1 Elizabeth C Page  2 Mark N Brook  2 Sarah Thomas  3 Natalie Taylor  3 Jennifer Pope  2 Jana McHugh  2 Ann-Britt Jones  2 Questa Karlsson  2 Susan Merson  2 Kai Ren Ong  4 Jonathan Hoffman  4 Camilla Huber  4 Lovise Maehle  5 Eli Marie Grindedal  5 Astrid Stormorken  5 D Gareth Evans  6 Jeanette Rothwell  6 Fiona Lalloo  6 Angela F Brady  7 Marion Bartlett  7 Katie Snape  8 Helen Hanson  8 Paul James  9 Joanne McKinley  10 Lyon Mascarenhas  10 Sapna Syngal  11 Chinedu Ukaegbu  12 Lucy Side  13 Tessy Thomas  13 Julian Barwell  14 Manuel R Teixeira  15 Louise Izatt  16 Mohnish Suri  17 Finlay A Macrae  18 Nicola Poplawski  19 Rakefet Chen-Shtoyerman  20 Munaza Ahmed  21 Hannah Musgrave  22 Nicola Nicolai  23 Lynn Greenhalgh  24 Carole Brewer  25 Nicholas Pachter  26 Allan D Spigelman  27 Ashraf Azzabi  28 Brian T Helfand  29 Dorothy Halliday  30 Saundra Buys  31 Teresa Ramon Y Cajal  32 Alan Donaldson  33 Kathleen A Cooney  34 Marion Harris  35 John McGrath  36 Rosemarie Davidson  37 Amy Taylor  38 Peter Cooke  39 Kathryn Myhill  3 Matthew Hogben  3 Neil K Aaronson  40 Audrey Ardern-Jones  3 Chris H Bangma  41 Elena Castro  42 David Dearnaley  43 Alexander Dias  44 Tim Dudderidge  45 Diana M Eccles  46 Kate Green  6 Jorunn Eyfjord  47 Alison Falconer  48 Christopher S Foster  49 Henrik Gronberg  50 Freddie C Hamdy  51 Oskar Johannsson  52 Vincent Khoo  53 Hans Lilja  54 Geoffrey J Lindeman  55 Jan Lubinski  56 Karol Axcrona  57 Christos Mikropoulos  58 Anita V Mitra  59 Clare Moynihan  2 Holly Ni Raghallaigh  2 Gad Rennert  60 Rebecca Collier  17 IMPACT Study CollaboratorsJudith Offman  61 Zsofia Kote-Jarai  2 Rosalind A Eeles  62
Collaborators, Affiliations
Multicenter Study

A prospective prostate cancer screening programme for men with pathogenic variants in mismatch repair genes (IMPACT): initial results from an international prospective study

Elizabeth K Bancroft et al. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Lynch syndrome is a rare familial cancer syndrome caused by pathogenic variants in the mismatch repair genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2, that cause predisposition to various cancers, predominantly colorectal and endometrial cancer. Data are emerging that pathogenic variants in mismatch repair genes increase the risk of early-onset aggressive prostate cancer. The IMPACT study is prospectively assessing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in men with germline mismatch repair pathogenic variants. Here, we report the usefulness of PSA screening, prostate cancer incidence, and tumour characteristics after the first screening round in men with and without these germline pathogenic variants.

Methods: The IMPACT study is an international, prospective study. Men aged 40-69 years without a previous prostate cancer diagnosis and with a known germline pathogenic variant in the MLH1, MSH2, or MSH6 gene, and age-matched male controls who tested negative for a familial pathogenic variant in these genes were recruited from 34 genetic and urology clinics in eight countries, and underwent a baseline PSA screening. Men who had a PSA level higher than 3·0 ng/mL were offered a transrectal, ultrasound-guided, prostate biopsy and a histopathological analysis was done. All participants are undergoing a minimum of 5 years' annual screening. The primary endpoint was to determine the incidence, stage, and pathology of screening-detected prostate cancer in carriers of pathogenic variants compared with non-carrier controls. We used Fisher's exact test to compare the number of cases, cancer incidence, and positive predictive values of the PSA cutoff and biopsy between carriers and non-carriers and the differences between disease types (ie, cancer vs no cancer, clinically significant cancer vs no cancer). We assessed screening outcomes and tumour characteristics by pathogenic variant status. Here we present results from the first round of PSA screening in the IMPACT study. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00261456, and is now closed to accrual.

Findings: Between Sept 28, 2012, and March 1, 2020, 828 men were recruited (644 carriers of mismatch repair pathogenic variants [204 carriers of MLH1, 305 carriers of MSH2, and 135 carriers of MSH6] and 184 non-carrier controls [65 non-carriers of MLH1, 76 non-carriers of MSH2, and 43 non-carriers of MSH6]), and in order to boost the sample size for the non-carrier control groups, we randomly selected 134 non-carriers from the BRCA1 and BRCA2 cohort of the IMPACT study, who were included in all three non-carrier cohorts. Men were predominantly of European ancestry (899 [93%] of 953 with available data), with a mean age of 52·8 years (SD 8·3). Within the first screening round, 56 (6%) men had a PSA concentration of more than 3·0 ng/mL and 35 (4%) biopsies were done. The overall incidence of prostate cancer was 1·9% (18 of 962; 95% CI 1·1-2·9). The incidence among MSH2 carriers was 4·3% (13 of 305; 95% CI 2·3-7·2), MSH2 non-carrier controls was 0·5% (one of 210; 0·0-2·6), MSH6 carriers was 3·0% (four of 135; 0·8-7·4), and none were detected among the MLH1 carriers, MLH1 non-carrier controls, and MSH6 non-carrier controls. Prostate cancer incidence, using a PSA threshold of higher than 3·0 ng/mL, was higher in MSH2 carriers than in MSH2 non-carrier controls (4·3% vs 0·5%; p=0·011) and MSH6 carriers than MSH6 non-carrier controls (3·0% vs 0%; p=0·034). The overall positive predictive value of biopsy using a PSA threshold of 3·0 ng/mL was 51·4% (95% CI 34·0-68·6), and the overall positive predictive value of a PSA threshold of 3·0 ng/mL was 32·1% (20·3-46·0).

Interpretation: After the first screening round, carriers of MSH2 and MSH6 pathogenic variants had a higher incidence of prostate cancer compared with age-matched non-carrier controls. These findings support the use of targeted PSA screening in these men to identify those with clinically significant prostate cancer. Further annual screening rounds will need to confirm these findings.

Funding: Cancer Research UK, The Ronald and Rita McAulay Foundation, the National Institute for Health Research support to Biomedical Research Centres (The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust; Oxford; Manchester and the Cambridge Clinical Research Centre), Mr and Mrs Jack Baker, the Cancer Council of Tasmania, Cancer Australia, Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, Cancer Council of Victoria, Cancer Council of South Australia, the Victorian Cancer Agency, Cancer Australia, Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer (AECC), the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER), the Institut Català de la Salut, Autonomous Government of Catalonia, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute, Swedish Cancer Society, General Hospital in Malmö Foundation for Combating Cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests HL holds patents on intact PSA assays and is named on a patent for a statistical method to detect prostate cancer licensed to Arctic Partners and commercialised by OPKO Health, and has stock in Arctic Partners and OPKO Health and receives royalties from sales of the 4Kscore test. RAE has received speaker honoraria from Genitourinary-American Society of Clinical Oncology, The University of Chicago, European Society for Medical Oncology (paid by Bayer and Ipsen), and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (with support from Janssen), and is a member of the AstraZeneca UK Limited Prostate Dx Advisory Panel external expert committee. No organisation had any role in the decision to publish or in the writing of the manuscript. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study algorithm
Figure 2
Figure 2
Trial profile BRCA1 and BRCA2 non-carrier controls were included in every non-carrier control group, but only counted once in the total cohort number, therefore the sum of each genetic cohort does not equal the total. ASAP=atypical small acinar proliferation. HGPIN=high-grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasia.

Comment in

Similar articles

  • Outcomes of 10 years of PSA screening for prostate cancer in Norwegian men with Lynch syndrome.
    Grindedal EM, Zucknick M, Stormorken A, Rønne E, Tandstad NM, Isaacs WB, Axcrona K, Mæhle L. Grindedal EM, et al. Prostate. 2024 Jul;84(10):945-953. doi: 10.1002/pros.24711. Epub 2024 Apr 17. Prostate. 2024. PMID: 38629217
  • Targeted prostate cancer screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from the initial screening round of the IMPACT study.
    Bancroft EK, Page EC, Castro E, Lilja H, Vickers A, Sjoberg D, Assel M, Foster CS, Mitchell G, Drew K, Mæhle L, Axcrona K, Evans DG, Bulman B, Eccles D, McBride D, van Asperen C, Vasen H, Kiemeney LA, Ringelberg J, Cybulski C, Wokolorczyk D, Selkirk C, Hulick PJ, Bojesen A, Skytte AB, Lam J, Taylor L, Oldenburg R, Cremers R, Verhaegh G, van Zelst-Stams WA, Oosterwijk JC, Blanco I, Salinas M, Cook J, Rosario DJ, Buys S, Conner T, Ausems MG, Ong KR, Hoffman J, Domchek S, Powers J, Teixeira MR, Maia S, Foulkes WD, Taherian N, Ruijs M, Helderman-van den Enden AT, Izatt L, Davidson R, Adank MA, Walker L, Schmutzler R, Tucker K, Kirk J, Hodgson S, Harris M, Douglas F, Lindeman GJ, Zgajnar J, Tischkowitz M, Clowes VE, Susman R, Ramón y Cajal T, Patcher N, Gadea N, Spigelman A, van Os T, Liljegren A, Side L, Brewer C, Brady AF, Donaldson A, Stefansdottir V, Friedman E, Chen-Shtoyerman R, Amor DJ, Copakova L, Barwell J, Giri VN, Murthy V, Nicolai N, Teo SH, Greenhalgh L, Strom S, Henderson A, McGrath J, Gallagher D, Aaronson N, Ardern-Jones A, Bangma C, Dearnaley D, Costello P, Eyfjord J, Rothwell J, Falconer A, Gronberg H, Hamdy FC, Johannsson O, Khoo V, Kote-Jarai Z, Lubinski J, Axcrona … See abstract for full author list ➔ Bancroft EK, et al. Eur Urol. 2014 Sep;66(3):489-99. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.003. Epub 2014 Jan 15. Eur Urol. 2014. PMID: 24484606 Free PMC article.
  • Interim Results from the IMPACT Study: Evidence for Prostate-specific Antigen Screening in BRCA2 Mutation Carriers.
    Page EC, Bancroft EK, Brook MN, Assel M, Hassan Al Battat M, Thomas S, Taylor N, Chamberlain A, Pope J, Raghallaigh HN, Evans DG, Rothwell J, Maehle L, Grindedal EM, James P, Mascarenhas L, McKinley J, Side L, Thomas T, van Asperen C, Vasen H, Kiemeney LA, Ringelberg J, Jensen TD, Osther PJS, Helfand BT, Genova E, Oldenburg RA, Cybulski C, Wokolorczyk D, Ong KR, Huber C, Lam J, Taylor L, Salinas M, Feliubadaló L, Oosterwijk JC, van Zelst-Stams W, Cook J, Rosario DJ, Domchek S, Powers J, Buys S, O'Toole K, Ausems MGEM, Schmutzler RK, Rhiem K, Izatt L, Tripathi V, Teixeira MR, Cardoso M, Foulkes WD, Aprikian A, van Randeraad H, Davidson R, Longmuir M, Ruijs MWG, Helderman van den Enden ATJM, Adank M, Williams R, Andrews L, Murphy DG, Halliday D, Walker L, Liljegren A, Carlsson S, Azzabi A, Jobson I, Morton C, Shackleton K, Snape K, Hanson H, Harris M, Tischkowitz M, Taylor A, Kirk J, Susman R, Chen-Shtoyerman R, Spigelman A, Pachter N, Ahmed M, Ramon Y Cajal T, Zgajnar J, Brewer C, Gadea N, Brady AF, van Os T, Gallagher D, Johannsson O, Donaldson A, Barwell J, Nicolai N, Friedman E, Obeid E, Greenhalgh L, Murthy V, Copakova L, Saya S, McGrath J, Cooke P, Rønlund K, Richardson K, Hen… See abstract for full author list ➔ Page EC, et al. Eur Urol. 2019 Dec;76(6):831-842. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.019. Epub 2019 Sep 16. Eur Urol. 2019. PMID: 31537406 Free PMC article.
  • Prostate cancer screening in BRCA and Lynch syndrome mutation carriers.
    Castro E, Goh CL, Eeles RA. Castro E, et al. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2013. doi: 10.14694/EdBook_AM.2013.33.e50. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2013. PMID: 23714454 Review.
  • Bringing Prostate Cancer Germline Genetics into Clinical Practice.
    Das S, Salami SS, Spratt DE, Kaffenberger SD, Jacobs MF, Morgan TM. Das S, et al. J Urol. 2019 Aug;202(2):223-230. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000137. Epub 2019 Jul 8. J Urol. 2019. PMID: 30730411 Review.

Cited by

References

    1. Saunders EJ, Kote-Jarai Z, Eeles RA. Identification of germline genetic variants that increase prostate cancer risk and influence development of aggressive disease. Cancers. 2021;13:760. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Win AK, Jenkins MA, Dowty JG. Prevalence and penetrance of major genes and polygenes for colorectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017;26:404–412. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dominguez-Valentin M, Sampson JR, Seppälä TT. Cancer risks by gene, age, and gender in 6350 carriers of pathogenic mismatch repair variants: findings from the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database. Genet Med. 2020;22:15–25. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Win AK, Young JP, Lindor NM. Colorectal and other cancer risks for carriers and noncarriers from families with a DNA mismatch repair gene mutation: a prospective cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:958–964. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barrow PJ, Ingham S, O’Hara C. The spectrum of urological malignancy in Lynch syndrome. Fam Cancer. 2013;12:57–63. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data