Comparison of BSGI and MRI as Approaches to Evaluating Residual Tumor Status after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Chinese Women with Breast Cancer
- PMID: 34679544
- PMCID: PMC8534722
- DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11101846
Comparison of BSGI and MRI as Approaches to Evaluating Residual Tumor Status after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Chinese Women with Breast Cancer
Abstract
Background: The present retrospective study was designed to evaluate the relative diagnostic utility of breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as means of evaluating female breast cancer patients in China.
Methods: A total of 229 malignant breast cancer patients underwent ultrasound, mammography, BSGI, and MRI between January 2015 and December 2018 for initial tumor staging. Of these patients, 73 were subsequently treated via definitive breast surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), of whom 17 exhibited a complete pathologic response (pCR) to NAC.
Results: BSGI and MRI were associated with 76.8% (43/56) and 83.9% (47/56) sensitivity (BSGI vs. MRI, p = 0.341) values, respectively, as a means of detecting residual tumors following NAC, while both these approaches exhibited comparable specificity in this diagnostic context. The specificity of BSGI for detecting residual tumors following NAC was 70.6% (12/17), and that of MRI was 58.8% (10/17) (BSGI vs. MRI, p = 0.473).
Conclusion: These results demonstrate that BSGI is a useful auxiliary approach to evaluating pCR to NAC treatment.
Keywords: breast cancer; breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI); magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC); residual tumor size.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Breast-Specific Gamma Imaging: An Added Value in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer, a Systematic Review.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep 23;14(19):4619. doi: 10.3390/cancers14194619. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36230540 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Breast-Specific Gamma Imaging Versus MRI: Comparing the Diagnostic Performance in Assessing Treatment Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Breast Cancer.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Mar;212(3):696-705. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18930. Epub 2019 Jan 8. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019. PMID: 30620672
-
Diagnostic performance of breast-specific gamma imaging in the assessment of residual tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 May;145(1):91-100. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-2920-z. Epub 2014 Mar 27. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014. PMID: 24671359
-
Comparison of BSGI, MRI, mammography, and ultrasound for the diagnosis of breast lesions and their correlations with specific molecular subtypes in Chinese women.BMC Med Imaging. 2020 Aug 15;20(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12880-020-00497-w. BMC Med Imaging. 2020. PMID: 32799808 Free PMC article.
-
The Diagnostic Performance of DCE-MRI in Evaluating the Pathological Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.Front Oncol. 2020 Feb 12;10:93. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00093. eCollection 2020. Front Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32117747 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Breast-Specific Gamma Imaging: An Added Value in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer, a Systematic Review.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep 23;14(19):4619. doi: 10.3390/cancers14194619. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36230540 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Modalities for Breast Cancer Diagnosis: An Overview of Recent Findings and Perspectives.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 9;12(11):2741. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112741. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36359584 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration. Fitzmaurice C., Abate D., Abbasi N., Abbastabar H., Abd-Allah F., Abdel-Rahman O., Abdelalim A., Abdoli A., Abdollahpour I., et al. Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 29 cancer groups, 1990 to 2017: A Systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:1749–1768. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2996. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Ejlertsen B. Adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer. Dan. Med. J. 2016;63:B5222. - PubMed
-
- Kaufmann M., Von Minckwitz G., Mamounas E.P., Cameron D., Carey L.A., Cristofanilli M., Denkert C., Eiermann W., Gnant M., Harris J.R., et al. Recommendations from an International Consensus Conference on the Current Status and Future of Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Primary Breast Cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2012;19:1508–1516. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2108-2. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Palshof F.K., Lanng C., Kroman N., Benian C., Vejborg I., Bak A., Talman M.L., Balslev E., Tvedskov T.F. Prediction of pathologic complete response in breast cancer patients comparing magnetic resonance imaging with ultrasound in neoadjuvant setting. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2021 doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10117-8. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources