Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 22;11(10):2765.
doi: 10.3390/ani11102765.

Handlers' Expectations and Perceived Compatibility regarding the Partnership with Their First Guide Dogs

Affiliations

Handlers' Expectations and Perceived Compatibility regarding the Partnership with Their First Guide Dogs

Janice Lloyd et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

The main function of a guide dog is as a mobility aid, but they can also fulfill psychosocial roles as companions, social facilitators, and objects/providers of affection. This study examined the outcome of 50 peoples' (handlers) partnerships with their first guide dog. Overall compatibility and the fulfilment of the handlers' expectations regarding mobility and social factors related to guide dog usage were measured, and relationships between putative risk factors and the outcome of matching success were identified. The findings demonstrate that the dogs are generally exceeding expectations. The high average ratings of compatibility were notable, particularly with respect to the emotional compatibility between handler and dog. Comparing responses of those who felt the handler-dog pairing was a good match with those who felt it was a mismatch revealed it was the working aspects of the relationship that differentiated the two groups. However, the many aspects of life with a guide dog, beyond the complexities of the working relationship, suggest that a more nuanced compatibility measure accommodating both positive and negative aspects of the relationship could assist with matching, training and follow up of the handler-dog team to maximize success.

Keywords: attachment; compatibility; expectations; guide dog matching; guide dog partnership; guide dogs; human-animal bond.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Whitstock R., Franck L., Haneline R. Dog guides. In: Blasch B., Wiener W., Welsh R., editors. Foundations of Orientation and Mobility. American Foundation for the Blind; New York, NY, USA: 1997. pp. 260–283.
    1. Blind Low Vision NZ. [(accessed on 3 March 2021)]. Available online: https://blindlowvision.org.nz/guide-dogs/about/facts/
    1. Audrestch H.M., Welan C.T., Grice D., Asher L., England G.C.W., Freeman S.L. Recognising the value of assistance dogs in society. Disabil. Health J. 2015;8:469–474. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2015.07.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lloyd J.K.F., La Grow S., Stafford K.J., Budge R.C. The guide dog as a mobility aid part 1: Perceived effectiveness on travel performance. Int. J. Orientat. Mobil. 2008;1:17–33. doi: 10.21307/ijom-2008-003. - DOI
    1. Whitmarsh L. The Benefits of Guide Dog Ownership. Vis. Impair. Res. 2005;7:27–42. doi: 10.1080/13882350590956439. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources