Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 14;11(10):2964.
doi: 10.3390/ani11102964.

Pet Reptiles-Are We Meeting Their Needs?

Affiliations

Pet Reptiles-Are We Meeting Their Needs?

Alexandre Azevedo et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

The ability to meet the needs of each species in captivity is at the heart of the ethical debate on the acceptability of keeping reptiles and other animals as pets. Little is known about the ability of reptile owners to understand their pets' behavior and to meet their welfare requirements. In this study, we surveyed pet reptile owners in Portugal (N = 220) to assess their behavioral knowledge and the provision of essential husbandry needs. Although two-thirds of respondents (68%) scored very good to excellent in terms of knowledge of their pet reptile's behaviors, only 15% of respondents met four essential reptile husbandry needs (temperature, lighting, diet and refuge) and 43% met two or less. None of the respondents reported their reptile's welfare as very poor, and only a single respondent reported it as poor. Logistic regression model showed that while snake owners had fourteen times higher odds of reporting adequate husbandry provision, lizard owners had the highest odds of reporting good or very good welfare despite providing less of their animals' basic husbandry needs. These results suggest that many pet reptiles in Portugal live in, at best, 'controlled deprivation' and are at risk of suffering poor welfare throughout their captive lives. Moreover, behaviors indicative of poor welfare and captivity stress were considered 'normal' by up to one quarter of respondents. We suggest that the frequency of these behaviors in pet reptiles has led to their acceptance as normal, precluding the search for ways to prevent them. These results suggest that campaigns aimed at challenging the current norm for adequate reptile welfare are warranted.

Keywords: animal welfare; behavior; chelonians; companion animals; controlled deprivation; exotics; lizards; reptiles; snakes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A.A. and M.W. declare no conflict of interest. L.G. is currently member of staff at Exoclinic-Clínica Veterinária, Algés, Portugal. J.F. is Clinical Director of Centro Veterinário de Exóticos do Porto, Porto, Portugal, and was not directly involved in recruiting survey participants. M.M.-S. is supported by the research project VETHICS 2022: A structured approach to describing and addressing the ethical challenges of the veterinary profession in Portugal (SFRH/BPD/117693/2016), funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal, and the European Social Fund. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Frequency plots of owner-reported data for (a) temperature range and (b) light source in snakes, lizards and chelonians. The data indicate limited access of pet reptiles to environmental conditions directly related with survival. Bar plots displaying frequencies for all husbandry questions are available in the Supplementary Materials (Figure S1).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportion of owners considering selected behaviors normal (i.e., “normal for the species and associated with positive welfare”) in snakes, lizards and chelonians. Bar plots displaying frequencies for all behavior questions are available in the Supplementary Materials (Figure S1).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Grant R., Montrose V., Wills A. ExNOTic: Should We Be Keeping Exotic Pets? Animals. 2017;7:47. doi: 10.3390/ani7060047. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Warwick C., Jessop M., Arena P., Pliny A., Nicholas E., Lambiris A. Future of Keeping Pet Reptiles and Amphibians: Animal Welfare and Public Health Perspective. Vet. Rec. 2017;181:454–455. doi: 10.1136/vr.j4640. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pasmans F., Bogaerts S., Braeckman J., Cunningham A.A., Hellebuyck T., Griffiths R.A., Sparreboom M., Schmidt B.R., Martel A. Future of Keeping Pet Reptiles and Amphibians: Towards Integrating Animal Welfare, Human Health and Environmental Sustainability. Vet. Rec. 2017;181:450. doi: 10.1136/vr.104296. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Warwick C., Steedman C., Jessop M., Arena P., Pilny A., Nicholas E. Exotic Pet Suitability: Understanding Some Problems and Using a Labeling System to Aid Animal Welfare, Environment, and Consumer Protection. J. Vet. Behav. 2018;26:17–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2018.03.015. - DOI
    1. Warwick C., Arena P., Lindley S., Jessop M., Steedman C. Assessing Reptile Welfare Using Behavioural Criteria. Practice. 2013;35:123–131. doi: 10.1136/inp.f1197. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources