Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 15;11(10):2970.
doi: 10.3390/ani11102970.

A Methodology to Quantify Resilience in Growing Pigs

Affiliations

A Methodology to Quantify Resilience in Growing Pigs

Houda Laghouaouta et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

There is a growing concern about the genetic determinism of resilience and its possible implementation in breeding programs. The objective of our study was to elaborate novel resilience indicators in growing pigs based on the deviation from the expected growth curve and the increment of the acute-phase protein haptoglobin (HP) after applying a common vaccine. A total of 445 pigs were vaccinated with an attenuated Aujeszky vaccine at 12 weeks of age. Deviation from the expected body weight (ΔBW) given the growth curve of unvaccinated pigs at 28 days post-vaccination (DPV) and the increment of HP at 4 DPV (ΔHP) were suggested as resilience indicators. Challenged pigs that maintained their productivity and had a minor activation of HP were deemed resilient, whereas pigs that had low ∆BW values and a high activation of HP were deemed susceptible. Pigs were also classified based on ∆BW and ∆HP relative to the expected BW at 28 DPV and to the basal level of HP, respectively. The concordance was high between both methods, indicating that ΔBW and ΔHP are not sensitive to the animal's expected BW nor the basal level of HP. The heritability estimates were moderate for ∆BW (0.33) and low-to-moderate for ∆HP (0.16). Our study suggests ΔBW and ΔHP as novel resilience indicators in pigs. The suggested indicators capture different aspects of resilience, are easy to measure, and are genetically controlled. Thus, they may be improved through selective breeding. Further analyses are needed to validate our findings.

Keywords: body weight; haptoglobin; pigs; resilience indicators; vaccine challenge.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Timeline and experimental design.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Classification of pigs as resilient, average, and susceptible based on the first (Q1) and the third (Q3) quartiles of ∆BW and ∆HP. ∆BW: body weight deviation from the expected growth curve of control pigs at 28 days post-vaccination, ∆HP: haptoglobin increment at 4 days post-vaccination.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Projection of the resilient, average, and susceptible groups obtained with the first (Q1) and third (Q3) quartiles of ∆BW and ∆HP on the plane defined by %HP and %BW. Individuals were colored according to their group classification using the criterion from Figure 2 to visualize concordance between both methods. ∆BW: body weight deviation from the expected growth curve of control pigs at 28 days post-vaccination (DPV), ∆HP: haptoglobin increment at 4 DPV, %BW: ratio between ∆BW and the expected body weight at 28 DPV, %HP: ratio between ∆HP and the basal level of haptoglobin.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Growth curves of pigs from the resilient and susceptible groups. The grey band represents the confidence interval. Individuals were colored according to their group classification using the criterion from Figure 2.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. FAO . Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT Statistical Database; Rome, Italy: 2019.
    1. Colditz I.G., Hine B.C. Resilience in farm animals: Biology, management, breeding and implications for animal welfare. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2016;56:1961–1983. doi: 10.1071/AN15297. - DOI
    1. Iung L.H.D.S., Carvalheiro R., Neves H.H.D.R., Mulder H.A. Genetics and genomics of uniformity and resilience in livestock and aquaculture species: A review. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2020;137:263–280. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12454. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martínez-Miró S., Tecles F., Ramón M., Escribano D., Hernández F., Madrid J., Orengo J., Martínez-Subiela S., Manteca X., Cerón J.J. Causes, consequences and biomarkers of stress in swine: An update. BMC Vet. Res. 2016;12:171. doi: 10.1186/s12917-016-0791-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berghof T.V.L., Bovenhuis H., Mulder H.A. Body Weight Deviations as Indicator for Resilience in Layer Chickens. Front. Genet. 2019;10:1216. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01216. - DOI - PMC - PubMed