Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 10;13(20):5063.
doi: 10.3390/cancers13205063.

Quality of Life as a Mediator between Cancer Stage and Long-Term Mortality in Nasopharyngeal Cancer Patients Treated with Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy

Affiliations

Quality of Life as a Mediator between Cancer Stage and Long-Term Mortality in Nasopharyngeal Cancer Patients Treated with Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy

Kuan-Cho Liao et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: Quality of life (QoL) attained before, during, or after treatments is recognized as a vital factor associated with therapeutic benefits in cancer patients. This nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patient longitudinal study assessed the relationship among QoL, cancer stage, and long-term mortality in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

Patients and methods: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core QoL questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the head and neck cancer-specific QoL questionnaire module (QLQ-HN35) were employed to evaluate four-dimensional QoL outcomes at five time points: pre- (n = 682), during (around 40 Gy) (n = 675), 3 months (n = 640), 1 year (n = 578) and 2 years post-IMRT (n = 505), respectively, for 682 newly diagnosed NPC patients treated between 2003 and 2017 at a single institute. The median followed-up time was 7.5 years, ranging from 0.3 to 16.1 years. Generalized estimating equations, multivariable proportional hazards models, and Baron and Kenny's method were used to assess the investigated effects.

Results: Advanced AJCC stage (III-IV) patients revealed a 2.26-fold (95% CI-1.56 to 3.27) higher covariate-adjusted mortality risk than early-stage (I-II) patients. Compared with during IMRT, advanced-stage patients had a significantly low global health QoL and a significantly high QoL-HN35 symptom by a large magnitude at pre-, 3 months, and 2 years post-IMRT. QoL scales at pre-IMRT, 1 year, and 2 years post-IMRT were significantly associated with mortality. The effect changes of mortality risk explained by global health QoL, QoL-C30, and QoL-HN35 symptom were 5.8-9.8% at pre-IMRT but at 2 years post-IMRT were 39.4-49.4% by global health QoL and QoL-HN35 symptoms.

Conclusions: We concluded advanced cancer stage correlates with a long-term high mortality in NPC patients treated with IMRT and the association is partially intermediated by QoL at pre-IMRT and 2 years post-IMRT. Therefore, QoL-HN35 symptom and global health QoL-dependent medical support and care should be focused and tailored at 2 years post-IMRT.

Keywords: Baron and Kenny’s method; intensity modulated radiotherapy; mediator; mortality; nasopharyngeal carcinoma; quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cumulative mortality rates of nasopharyngeal cancer patients associated with AJCC stages. Note: Cumulative mortality rates were estimated from the Kaplan–Meier estimators. Log-rank test was used to test the equality of cumulative mortality rates between AJCC stages (difference in 4 AJCC stages, χ2 = 61.65, p < 0.001; difference in AJCC stage I–II versus III–IV, χ2 = 22.66, p < 0.001). CI, confidence interval.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distributions of adjusted quality of life (QoL) mean scores associated with AJCC stage (I–II/III–IV) at different intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)-related time points for nasopharyngeal cancer patients. (A) Global health QoL; (B) Functioning QoL; (C) QoL-C30 symptom; (D) QoL-HN35 symptom. Note: The investigated time periods included the pre-IMRT, during IMRT (40 Gy), and 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years post IMRT. The QoL scores were adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, educational level, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, chemotherapy, and IMRT treatment period. * denotes significant difference in the adjusted QoL mean scores between AJCC stage I–II and III–IV. GHQoL, Global Health QoL, FQoL, Functioning QoL, QoL-C30 symptom, and QoL-HN35 symptom denoted the average QoL scores obtained from the EORTC QLQ-C30 global QoL scale, 5 functional scales, and 9 symptom scales/items, and EORTC QLQ-HN35 18 symptom scales/items, respectively. IMRT, intensity-modulated radiotherapy; yrs, years; EORTC, European organization for research and treatment of cancer; QoL-C30, the core QoL questionnaire of EORTC; QoL-HN35, the head and neck cancer-specific QoL questionnaire module of EORTC.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The intermediated paths of quality of life (QoL) scales at different intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)-related time points on the association between advanced AJCC stage (III–IV) and higher mortality risk in nasopharyngeal cancer patient follow-up cohort (intermediated path: Advanced AJCC stage to QoL score to Mortality risk). Note: Effect change (EC) was the excessive effect explained by a specific QoL scale at a time period. Global health QoL, QoL-C30 symptom, and QoL-HN35 symptom denoted the average QoL scores obtained from the EORTC QLQ-C30 global QoL scale, 9 symptom scales/items, and EORTC QLQ-HN35 18 symptom scales/items, respectively. AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer; EORTC, European organization for research and treatment of cancer; QoL-C30, the core QoL questionnaire of EORTC; QoL-HN35, the head and neck cancer-specific QoL questionnaire module of EORTC.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chen Y., Chan A.T.C., Le Q.-T., Blanchard P., Sun Y., Ma J. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet. 2019;394:64–80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30956-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee A.W., Ng W.T., Chan L.L., Hung W.M., Chan C.C., Sze H.C., Chan O.S.H., Chang A.T., Yeung R.M. Evolution of treatment for nasopharyngeal cancer—Success and setback in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era. Radiother. Oncol. 2014;110:377–384. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.02.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kanno M., Narita N., Fujimoto Y., Wakisaka N., Yoshizaki T., Kodaira T., Makita C., Sato Y., Yamazaki K., Wakaoka T., et al. Third Epidemiological Analysis of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in the Central Region of Japan from 2006 to 2015. Cancers. 2019;11:1180. doi: 10.3390/cancers11081180. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ruuskanen M., Grenman R., Leivo I., Vahlberg T., Mäkitie A., Saarilahti K., Wigren T., Korpela M., Voutilainen L., Koivunen P., et al. Outcome of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Finland: A nationwide study. Acta Oncol. 2018;57:251–256. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1346378. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sitlinger A., Zafar S.Y. Health-Related Quality of Life: The impact on morbidity and mortality. Surg. Oncol. Clin. N. Am. 2018;27:675–684. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2018.05.008. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources