Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Sep 23;12(10):1472.
doi: 10.3390/genes12101472.

Formalin-Fixed and Paraffin-Embedded Samples for Next Generation Sequencing: Problems and Solutions

Affiliations
Review

Formalin-Fixed and Paraffin-Embedded Samples for Next Generation Sequencing: Problems and Solutions

Gerardo Cazzato et al. Genes (Basel). .

Abstract

Over the years, increasing information has been asked of the pathologist: we have moved from a purely morphological diagnosis to biomolecular and genetic studies, which have made it possible to implement the use of molecular targeted therapies, such as anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) molecules in EGFR-mutated lung cancer, for example. Today, next generation sequencing (NGS) has changed the approach to neoplasms, to the extent that, in a short time, it has gained a place of absolute importance and diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic utility. In this scenario, formaldehyde-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) biological tissue samples are a source of clinical and molecular information. However, problems can arise in the genetic material (DNA and RNA) for use in NGS due to fixation, and work is being devoted to possible strategies to reduce its effects. In this paper, we discuss the applications of FFPE tissue samples in the execution of NGS, we focus on the problems arising with the use of this type of material for nucleic acid extraction and, finally, we consider the most useful strategies to prevent and reduce single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNV) and other fixation artifacts.

Keywords: DNA; FFPE; NGS; PCR; RNA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Literature search and article selection.

References

    1. Aly S., Sabri D.M. Next generation sequencing (NGS): A golden tool in forensic toolkit. Arch. Forensic Med. Criminol. 2015;4:260–271. doi: 10.5114/amsik.2015.61029. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu L., Li Y., Li S., Hu N., He Y., Pong R., Lin D., Lu L., Law M. Comparison of Next-Generation Sequencing Systems. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2012;2012:896451. doi: 10.1155/2012/251364. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lavacchi D., Roviello G., D’Angelo A. Tumor-Agnostic Treatment for Cancer: When How is Better than Where. Clin. Drug Investig. 2020;40:519–527. doi: 10.1007/s40261-020-00915-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pareek C.S., Smoczynski R., Tretyn A. Sequencing technologies and genome sequencing. J. Appl. Genet. 2011;52:413–435. doi: 10.1007/s13353-011-0057-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence. [(accessed on 31 August 2021)]. Available online: http://www.cebm.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/CEBM-Levels-of-Evidence-2....