Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Sep 28;8(10):862.
doi: 10.3390/children8100862.

Evaluation and Risk Assessment of Congenital Anomalies in Neonates

Affiliations
Review

Evaluation and Risk Assessment of Congenital Anomalies in Neonates

Rita P Verma. Children (Basel). .

Abstract

Congenital anomalies (CA) are a large heterogeneous group of disorders of abnormal morphogenesis or biochemistry which present at birth and carry widely variable implications for morbidity and mortality. They are the leading cause of infant mortality in the USA, with an incidence of 3-4% of all births. CA are the fourth leading cause of neonatal mortality worldwide, with an estimated 295,000 deaths annually. The enormous variability in the clinical presentation in terms of severity, time of occurrence, course, complications, management, and outcomes makes the evaluation of CA complicated, highly specific, and individualized. The anomalies can impart tremendous physical, social, and emotional distress on the patient with massive emotional, social, financial, and medical implications for the family and society. The diagnosis may remain elusive despite rigorous, elaborate, and extensive investigations in many cases. While the enormous strides in genetic testing and gene modification therapy have an encouraging impact on the diagnosis and treatment, the risk assessment of recurrence in the family and population of CA remains obscure in most cases due to the lack of information and referable evidence.

Keywords: congenital anomalies; genetics; infant mortality; morphogenesis; phenotype; risk assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Metatarsus adductus as an example of deformation due to intrauterine positioning or space constraints.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Amputation of digits with a constricting amniotic band as an example of disruption.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Examples of aneuploidy with Trisomy 21 showing an extra chromosome 21 (left) and Turner’s syndrome with missing genes from the short arm of the X chromosome (right).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Common structural chromosomal anomalies resulting in abnormal genotype.

References

    1. Mburia-Mwalili A., Yang W. Birth Defects Surveillance in the United States: Challenges and Implications of International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification Implementation. Int. Sch. Res. Not. 2014;2014:212874. doi: 10.1155/2014/212874. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoyert D.L., Xu J.Q. Deaths: Preliminary data for 2011. Natl. Vital. Stat. Rep. 2012;61:40–42. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization . “Congenital Anomalies,” Fact Sheet 370. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2014. [(accessed on 5 August 2021)]. Available online: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs370/en/
    1. Arth A.C., Tinker S.C., Simeone R.M., Ailes E.C., Cragan J.D., Grosse S. Inpatient Hospitalization Costs Associated with Birth Defects Among Persons of All Ages—United States, 2013. MMWR. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2017;66:41–46. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6602a1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Queißer-Luft A., Stolz G., Wiesel A., Schlaefer K., Spranger J. Malformations in newborn: Results based on 30940 infants and fetuses from the Mainz congenital birth defect monitoring system (1990-1998) Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2002;266:163–167. doi: 10.1007/s00404-001-0265-4. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources