Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 24;9(10):2020.
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9102020.

Identification of Lactobacillus Strains Capable of Fermenting Fructo-Oligosaccharides and Inulin

Affiliations

Identification of Lactobacillus Strains Capable of Fermenting Fructo-Oligosaccharides and Inulin

John A Renye Jr et al. Microorganisms. .

Abstract

Novel probiotic strains that can ferment prebiotics are important for functional foods. The utilization of prebiotics is strain specific, so we screened 86 Lactobacillus strains and compared them to Bifidobacterium breve 2141 for the ability to grow and produce SCFA when 1% inulin or fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) were provided as the carbon source in batch fermentations. When grown anaerobically at 32 °C, ten Lactobacillus strains grew on both prebiotic substrates (OD600 ≥ 1.2); while Lactobacillus coryniformis subsp. torquens B4390 grew only in the presence of inulin. When the growth temperature was increased to 37 °C to simulate the human body temperature, four of these strains were no longer able to grow on either prebiotic. Additionally, L. casei strains 4646 and B441, and L. helveticus strains B1842 and B1929 did not require anaerobic conditions for growth on both prebiotics. Short-chain fatty acid analysis was performed on cell-free supernatants. The concentration of lactic acid produced by the ten Lactobacillus strains in the presence of prebiotics ranged from 73-205 mM. L. helveticus B1929 produced the highest concentration of acetic acid ~19 mM, while L. paraplantarum B23115 and L. paracasei ssp. paracasei B4564 produced the highest concentrations of propionic (1.8-4.0 mM) and butyric (0.9 and 1.1 mM) acids from prebiotic fermentation. L. mali B4563, L. paraplantarum B23115 and L. paracasei ssp. paracasei B4564 were identified as butyrate producers for the first time. These strains hold potential as synbiotics with FOS or inulin in the development of functional foods, including infant formula.

Keywords: Lactobacillus; fermentation; fructo-oligosaccharides; inulin; prebiotic; probiotic; short-chain fatty acids.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Growth of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains in mMRS broth (no glucose) supplemented with 1% FOS (blue bars) or inulin (orange bars) under anaerobic conditions. Bars represent the average optical density (600 nm) after incubation at 32 °C for 18–24 h (± standard deviation).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Growth of selected Lactobacillus strain at 32 °C (orange bars) or 37 °C (blue bars) in mMRS broth with (A) 1% FOS or (B) inulin under anerobic conditions. Bars represent the average optical density (600 nm) after 24 h of growth (± standard deviation).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Growth of select Lactobacillus strains in mMRS broth containing (A,C) 1% FOS or (B,D) inulin at 32 °C in the presence (orange and yellow symbols) or absence (blue and gray symbols) of Oxyrase, which was used to generate anaerobic growth conditions. Strains shown: L. casei strains 4646 (LC4646); LC3; L. paracasei B4564 (LP B4564); and L. mali B4563 (LM B4563).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Short-chain fatty acid production by the ten Lactobacillus strains capable of fermenting both (A,C) FOS and (B,D) inulin. Bars represent the average concentration of each SCFA (nM): lactic (blue bars), acetic (orange bars), propionic acids (gray bars), and butyric acids (yellow bars) as the average of three replicates (±standard deviation).

References

    1. Nagpal R., Kumar A., Kumar M., Behare P.V., Jain S., Yadav H. Probiotics, their health benefits and applications for developing healthier foods: A review. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2012;334:1–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2012.02593.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ramakrishna B. Probiotic-induced changes in the intestinal epithelium: Implications in gastrointestinal disease. Trop. Gastroenterol. 2009;30:76–85. - PubMed
    1. Wallace T.D., Bradley S., Buckley N.D., Green-Johnson J.M. Interactions of lactic acid bacteria with human intestinal epithelial cells: Effects on cytokine production. J. Food Prot. 2003;66:466–472. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-66.3.466. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arora T., Singh S., Sharma R.K. Probiotics: Interaction with gut microbiome and antiobesity potential. Nutrition. 2013;29:591–596. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2012.07.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rooks M.G., Veiga P., Wardwell-Scott L.H., Tickle T., Segata N., Michaud M., Gallini C.A., Beal C., Hylckama-Vlieg J.E.T.V., Ballal S.A., et al. Gut microbiome composition and function in experimental colitis during active disease and treatment-induced remission. ISME J. 2014;8:1403–1417. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources