Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 4;57(10):1062.
doi: 10.3390/medicina57101062.

ENT Residents Benefit from a Structured Operation Planning Approach in the Training of Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Affiliations

ENT Residents Benefit from a Structured Operation Planning Approach in the Training of Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Sven Becker et al. Medicina (Kaunas). .

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Preoperative planning utilizing computed tomographies (CT) is of utmost importance in functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Frequently, no uniform documentation and planning structures are available to residents in training. Consequently, overall completeness and quality of operation planning may vary greatly. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the impact of a structured operation planning (SOP) approach on the report quality and user convenience during a 4-day sinus surgery course. Materials and Methods: Fifteen participant were requested to plan a FESS procedure based on a CT scan of the paranasal sinuses that exhibited common pathological features, in a conventional manner, using a free text. Afterwards, the participants reevaluated the same scans by means of a specifically designed structured reporting template. Two experienced ENT surgeons assessed the collected conventional operation planning (COP) and SOP methods independently with regard to time requirements, overall quality, and legibility. User convenience data were collected by utilizing visual analogue scales. Results: A significantly greater time expenditure was associated with SOPs (183 s vs. 297 s, p = 0.0003). Yet, legibility (100% vs. 72%, p < 0.0001) and overall completeness (61.3% vs. 22.7%, p < 0.0001) of SOPs was significantly superior to COPs. Additionally, description of highly relevant variants in anatomy and pathologies were outlined in greater detail. User convenience data delineated a significant preference for SOPs (VAS 7.9 vs. 6.9, p = 0.0185). Conclusions: CT-based planning of FESS procedures by residents in training using a structured approach is more time-consuming while producing a superior report quality in terms of detailedness and readability. Consequently, SOP can be considered as a valuable tool in the process of preoperative evaluations, especially within residency.

Keywords: computed tomography; functional endoscopic sinus surgery; medical education; medical informatics; structured surgical training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Wieland H. Sommer is the founder and CEO and Matthias F. Froelich is a medical consultant of the company Smart Reporting GmbH, which hosts an online platform for structured reporting. The other authors of this manuscript have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Time needed to plan (A), evaluation of legibility (B), and overall completeness of structured (SOP), as well as conventional operation planning (COP, (B,C)). Analysis of time expenditure for operation planning exhibits a significant difference in favor of conventional operation planning (COP). Using SOP results in significantly better legibility and overall completeness. In detail, all relevant anatomical features are addressed considerably more completely using SOP. *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Evaluation of user convenience yields a significant overall preference for structured operation planning (SOP) by participating residents in comparison to conventional operation planning (COP). Detailed analysis showed a tendency in favor of SOP in all investigated items without reaching the level of significance. * p < 0.05.

References

    1. Baban M.I.A., Mirza B., Castelnuovo P. Radiological and endoscopic findings in patients undergoing revision endoscopic sinus surgery. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 2020;42:1003–1012. doi: 10.1007/s00276-020-02427-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kandukuri R., Phatak S. Evaluation of Sinonasal Diseases by Computed Tomography. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2016;10:TC09–TC12. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/23197.8826. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grevers G. Anterior skull base trauma during endoscopic sinus surgery for nasal polyposis preferred sites for iatrogenic injuries. Rhinology. 2001;39:1–4. - PubMed
    1. Wu H., Shen T., Chen J., Yan J. Long-term therapeutic outcome of ophthalmic complications following endoscopic sinus surgery. Medicine. 2016;95:e4896. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004896. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lum S.G., Gendeh B.S., Husain S., Gendeh H.S., Ismail M.R., Toh C.J., Izaham A., Tan H.J. Internal carotid artery injury during endonasal sinus surgery: Our experience and review of the literature. Acta Otorhinolaryngol. Ital. 2019;39:130–136. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-1312. - DOI - PMC - PubMed