Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Oct 13;10(10):1315.
doi: 10.3390/pathogens10101315.

Biosecurity at Cattle Farms: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats

Affiliations
Review

Biosecurity at Cattle Farms: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats

Véronique Renault et al. Pathogens. .

Abstract

Biosecurity is a key component of any animal and public health strategy and disease prevention and control programs. This study reviewed the main findings of different studies implemented from 2015 to 2021 to analyse the biosecurity situation at Belgian cattle farms, including attitudes and behaviours of cattle farmers and rural veterinarians regarding biosecurity measures. Specifically, the objective was to perform a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats) analysis of the situation and propose a new conceptual framework improving the level of biosecurity in the cattle sector. Biosecurity in cattle farming remains relatively low and faces multiple challenges. Its future improvement requires the different stakeholders to agree on shared goals and objectives and to carefully consider animal, public and environmental health, as well as socioeconomic and cultural factors. Further cost efficiency studies are required to identify the most important biosecurity measures and convince the stakeholders of their utility and benefits. Cattle farmers rely mainly on rural veterinarians for technical guidance and consider them as trustful informants. To be more effective in promoting these good practices, rural veterinarians need a proper guidance from the authorities, a proper training on biosecurity and communication, as well as an enabling environment.

Keywords: Belgium; SWOT analysis; biosecurity; cattle; conceptual framework; context.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Biosecurity principles and compartments in animal facilities (Adapted form: Saegerman, Dal Pozzo and Humblet, 2012).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proposed conceptual model explaining the factors affecting the implementation of biosecurity measures at Belgian cattle farms. In orange, negative-effect factors; in green, positive-effect factors.

References

    1. International Food Safety Authorities Network. World Health Organization. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations . Biosecurity: An Integrated Approach to Manage Risk to Human, Animal and Plant Life and Health. International Food Safety Authorities Network; Geneva, Switzerland: 2010.
    1. European Commission . A New Animal Health Strategy for the European Union (2007–2013) Where “Prevention is Better than Cure”. European Commission; Brussels, Belgium: 2007. p. 28.
    1. Sumilo D., Asokliene L., Bormane A., Vasilenko V., Golovljova I., Randolph S.E. Climate change cannot explain the upsurge of tick-borne encephalitis in the Baltics. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000500. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brennan M.L., Christley R. Biosecurity on cattle farms: A study in North-West England. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e28139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028139. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nöremark M., Frössling J., Lewerin S.S. Application of routines that contribute to on-farm biosecurity as reported by Swedish livestock farmers. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2010;57:225–236. doi: 10.1111/j.1865-1682.2010.01140.x. - DOI - PubMed