Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 15;13(10):3616.
doi: 10.3390/nu13103616.

Risk Factors for Failure of Direct Oral Feeding Following a Totally Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

Affiliations

Risk Factors for Failure of Direct Oral Feeding Following a Totally Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

Henricus J B Janssen et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

Recently, it has been shown that directly starting oral feeding (DOF) from postoperative day one (POD1) after a totally minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (MIE-IL) can further improve postoperative outcomes. However, in some patients, tube feeding by a preemptively placed jejunostomy is necessary. This single-center cohort study investigated risk factors associated with failure of DOF in patients that underwent a MIE-IL between October 2015 and April 2021. A total of 165 patients underwent a MIE-IL, in which DOF was implemented in the enhanced recovery after surgery program. Of these, 70.3% (n = 116) successfully followed the nutritional protocol. In patients in which tube feeding was needed (29.7%; n = 49), female sex (compared to male) (OR 3.5 (95% CI 1.5-8.1)) and higher ASA scores (III + IV versus II) (OR 2.2 (95% CI 1.0-4.8)) were independently associated with failure of DOF for any cause. In case of failure, this was either due to a postoperative complication (n = 31, 18.8%) or insufficient caloric intake on POD5 (n = 18, 10.9%). In the subgroup of patients with complications, higher ASA scores (OR 2.8 (95% CI 1.2-6.8)) and histological subtypes (squamous-cell carcinoma versus adenocarcinoma and undifferentiated) (OR 5.2 (95% CI 1.8-15.1)) were identified as independent risk factors. In the subgroup of patients with insufficient caloric intake, female sex was identified as a risk factor (OR 5.8 (95% CI 2.0-16.8)). Jejunostomy-related complications occurred in 17 patients (10.3%). In patients with preoperative risk factors, preemptively placing a jejunostomy may be considered to ensure that nutritional goals are met.

Keywords: enhanced recovery after surgery; esophageal cancer; jejunostomy; minimally invasive esophagectomy; nutrition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

    1. Voeten D.M., den Bakker C.M., Heineman D.J., Ket J.C.F., Daams F., van der Peet D.L. Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Versus Trimodality Therapy for Resectable Oesophageal Carcinoma: Meta-analyses and Systematic Review of Literature. World J. Surg. 2019;43:1271–1285. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-04901-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang J., Qin J., Jing S., Liu Q., Cheng Y., Wang Y., Cao F. Clinical complete response after chemoradiotherapy for carcinoma of thoracic esophagus: Is esophagectomy always necessary? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorac. Cancer. 2018;9:1638–1647. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12874. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li S., Liu H., Diao C., Wang X., Gao M., Li Z., Song L., Gao X., Han J., Wang F., et al. Prognosis of surgery combined with different adjuvant therapies in esophageal cancer treatment: A network meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017;8:36339–36353. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16193. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gottlieb-Vedi E., Kauppila J.H., Malietzis G., Nilsson M., Markar S.R., Lagergren J. Long-term Survival in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Compared to Open Esophagectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann. Surg. 2019;270:1005–1017. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003252. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yibulayin W., Abulizi S., Lv H., Sun W. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;14:304. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-1062-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources