Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 22;12(1):6140.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26379-5.

Ultra-selective molecular-sieving gas separation membranes enabled by multi-covalent-crosslinking of microporous polymer blends

Affiliations

Ultra-selective molecular-sieving gas separation membranes enabled by multi-covalent-crosslinking of microporous polymer blends

Xiuling Chen et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

High-performance membranes exceeding the conventional permeability-selectivity upper bound are attractive for advanced gas separations. In the context microporous polymers have gained increasing attention owing to their exceptional permeability, which, however, demonstrate a moderate selectivity unfavorable for separating similarly sized gas mixtures. Here we report an approach to designing polymeric molecular sieve membranes via multi-covalent-crosslinking of blended bromomethyl polymer of intrinsic microporosity and Tröger's base, enabling simultaneously high permeability and selectivity. Ultra-selective gas separation is achieved via adjusting reaction temperature, reaction time and the oxygen concentration with occurrences of polymer chain scission, rearrangement and thermal oxidative crosslinking reaction. Upon a thermal treatment at 300 °C for 5 h, membranes exhibit an O2/N2, CO2/CH4 and H2/CH4 selectivity as high as 11.1, 154.5 and 813.6, respectively, transcending the state-of-art upper bounds. The design strategy represents a generalizable approach to creating molecular-sieving polymer membranes with enormous potentials for high-performance separation processes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Schematic of crosslinking reactions between PIM-BM and TB.
a Chemical structure of PIM-BM and TB. b Proposed crosslinking mechanisms between PIM-BM and TB.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. SEM images and photos of polymer membranes after thermal crosslinking at varied temperatures.
a, c, e Cross-sectional images of PIM-BM/TB, PIM-BM/TB-250 °C-10 h and PIM-BM/TB-300 °C-5 h. b, d, f Surface images of PIM-BM/TB, PIM-BM/TB-250 °C-10 h and PIM-BM/TB-300 °C-5 h. g Photos of PIM-BM/TB treated at different temperatures.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Structural characterizations of fresh and thermally crosslinked PIM-BM/TB.
a XPS spectrum of Br 3d of fresh PIM-BM/TB. b XPS spectrum of Br 3d of PIM-BM/TB-120 °C-20 h. c XPS spectrum of Br 3d of PIM-BM/TB-200 °C-20 h. d XPS spectrum of Br 3d of PIM-BM/TB-250 °C-10 h. e XPS spectrum of Br 3d of XPIM-BM/TB-300 °C-5 h. f FTIR spectra of fresh and thermally crosslinked PIM-BM/TB.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Properties of crosslinked microporous membranes.
a Thermal stability of PIM-BM/TB and crosslinked PIM-BM/TB. b XRD profiles. c Mechanical properties of polymer membranes.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Characterization of PIM-BM/TB and XPIM-BM/TB membranes physical structures.
a Representative chain conformations in crosslinked PIM-BM/TB from computer modeling results. b 3-D view of crosslinked PIM-BM/TB modeling structure in an amorphous cell (300 °C-5 h) (cell size: 30 × 30 × 30 A; density: ~1.223 g/cm3; Gray–Van der Waals surface; dark gray–Connolly surface with pore radius of 1.45 A). c Pore size distribution from PALS.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Gas transport properties.
a Gas permeabilities as a function of kinetic diameters. b CO2/CH4 separation with Robeson upper bound. c H2/CH4 separation with upper bounds.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. Gas transport properties of membranes prepared under various conditions.
a Gas permeability and b gas selectivity as a function of reaction temperature. All samples were thermally treated at set-point temperature for 10–20 h under 200 ppm of O2, except that the sample at 300 °C was annealed for 5 h. c Gas permeability and d gas selectivity as a function of reaction time treated at 250 °C of crosslinked membranes. e Gas permeability and f gas selectivity as a function of oxygen concentrations for membranes treated at 250 °C of 10 h.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8. Effects of feed pressures and physical ageing on membranes.
a Pure CO2 permeability versus feed pressure. b CO2/CH4 ideal selectivity versus feed pressure. c CO2 permeability versus feed pressure for separating equimolar CO2/CH4 gas mixtures. d CO2/CH4 selectivity versus feed pressure for separating equimolar CO2/CH4 gas mixtures. e Pure gas permeability versus aging time of XPIM-BM/TB- 250 °C-10 h. f Gas selectivity versus aging time of XPIM-BM/TB- 250 °C-10 h.

References

    1. Low Z, Budd PM, McKeown NB, Patterson DA. Gas permeation properties, physical aging, and its mitigation in high free volume glassy polymers. Chem. Rev. 2018;118:5871–5911. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00629. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nugent P, et al. Porous materials with optimal adsorption thermodynamics and kinetics for CO2 separation. Nature. 2013;495:80–84. doi: 10.1038/nature11893. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sholl DS, Lively RP. Seven chemical separations to change the world. Nature. 2016;532:435–437. doi: 10.1038/532435a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Park HB, Kamcev J, Robeson LM, Elimelech M, Freeman BD. Maximizing the right stuff: the trade-off between membrane permeability and selectivity. Science. 2017;356:eaab0530. doi: 10.1126/science.aab0530. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Koh DY, McCool BA, Deckman HW, Lively RP. Reverse osmosis molecular differentiation of organic liquids using carbon molecular sieve membranes. Science. 2016;353:804–807. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf1343. - DOI - PubMed