Erosive potential of commonly available vapes: a cause for concern?
- PMID: 34686816
- DOI: 10.1038/s41415-021-3563-1
Erosive potential of commonly available vapes: a cause for concern?
Abstract
Objectives Relatively little is known about the erosive potential of vape products, an important consideration for dental health. This study analysed flavoured vapes with potentially low pH, including fruit and drink flavours.Methods The pH of 45 purposefully selected vapes was measured undiluted in triplicate. Serial dilution was conducted on the most erosive product to investigate if/when the erosive potential pH of 5.5 was reached. One of the most erosive samples was tested, undiluted and diluted, after four months of opening. Content analysis of the vape labels determined ingredients, place of manufacture, product usage instructions and health warnings.Results Eighty-four percent of undiluted vape samples had a pH below 5.5. Erosive potential was not predicted by the flavour, with orange and cola samples higher than anticipated (pH 3.56-6.23 and 5.04-5.63, respectively). Products that were predicted to be non-acidic such as vanilla showed considerable variation ranging from pH 4.69-5.63. Freshly opened or stored samples did not reach a non-erosive potential pH of 5.5 or above, even when diluted to represent concentrations used when vaped. Labels were not detailed enough to ascertain which ingredients were contributing to acidity or buffering capacity or to allow consumers to identify the least harmful products in terms of oral health.Conclusions Present labelling of commercially available vapes does not allow consumers to ascertain the erosive potential and possible dental damage that may be inflicted by their use. More effective labelling and/or health warnings are required to educate consumers and dental health professionals on these products.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to the British Dental Association.
Comment in
-
Vape labelling fails to report possible dental erosion and caries induced by e-cigarette fluids.Br Dent J. 2021 Dec;231(11):700. doi: 10.1038/s41415-021-3717-1. Br Dent J. 2021. PMID: 34893728 No abstract available.
-
Expert view: David Bartlett.Br Dent J. 2021 Dec;231(11):700. doi: 10.1038/s41415-021-3773-6. Br Dent J. 2021. PMID: 34893729 No abstract available.
-
Vaping misrepresentations.Br Dent J. 2022 Jun;232(12):840-841. doi: 10.1038/s41415-022-4409-1. Br Dent J. 2022. PMID: 35750806 No abstract available.
References
-
- Couch E T, Chaffee B W, Gansky S A, Walsh M M. The changing tobacco landscape: What dental professionals need to know. J Am Dent Assoc 2016; 147: 561-569.
-
- Nutt D J, Phillips L D, Balfour D et al. E-cigarettes are less harmful than smoking. Lancet 2016; 387: 1160-1162.
-
- Glantz S A, Bareham DW. E-Cigarettes: Use, Effects on Smoking, Risks, and Policy Implications. Ann Rev Public Health 2018; 39: 215-235.
-
- Harrell M B, Weaver S R, Loukas A et al. Flavoured e-cigarette use: Characterizing youth, young adult and adult users. Prev Med Rep 2017; 5: 33-40.
-
- WHO Study Group on Tobacco Production Regulation. Report on the scientific basis of tobacco product regulation: third report of a WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2009; 955: 1-41.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
