The influence of antineoplastic agents on the peri-implant bone around osseointegrated titanium implants: an in vivo histomorphometric and immunohistochemical study
- PMID: 34686918
- DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04239-2
The influence of antineoplastic agents on the peri-implant bone around osseointegrated titanium implants: an in vivo histomorphometric and immunohistochemical study
Abstract
Background and objective: The interaction between antineoplastic drugs used for treating cancer and non-affected tissues remains poorly assessed and may be critical for maintaining the quality of life for patients during and after treatment. This pre-clinical study evaluated the effects of cisplatin (CIS) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) on the peri-implant repair process around osseointegrated titanium implants installed in the tibiae of rats.
Material and methods: Were used 90 male rats, randomly divided into three groups (n = 30): physiological saline solution (PSS), CIS, and 5-FU. Titanium implants (4.0 × 2.2 mm) were inserted in both tibiae of all animals at day 0. The animals received either PSS, CIS, or 5-FU at 35 and 37 days. Euthanasia was performed at 50, 65, and 95 days after surgery. Histometric (bone/implant contact [BIC]) and bone area fraction occupancy (% BAFO), histological, and immunohistochemical (for bone morphogenetic protein 2/4 [BMP2/4], Runt-related transcription factor 2 [RUNX2], osteocalcin [OCN], and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase [TRAP]) analyses were performed. Data were statistically analyzed.
Results: Groups CIS and 5-FU presented lower BIC and lower BAFO as compared with PSS in all time points. The imbalance in bone turnover was observed by the lower number of BMP2/4-, RUNX2-, and OCN-positive cells/mm2 and the higher number of TRAP-positive cells/mm in groups CIS and 5-FU as compared with PSS in all time points. Persistent and exacerbated inflammation was observed in groups CIS and 5-FU.
Conclusions: Both antineoplastic agents interfered negatively in the bone turnover around osseointegrated titanium implants.
Clinical relevance: Closer and more careful follow-up of patients with osseointegrated implants that will undergo chemotherapy with either CIS or 5-FU shall be performed.
Keywords: Antineoplastic agents; Bone implant interface; Cisplatin; Fluorouracil; Osseointegration.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Smith LP, Ng M, Grubor D, Chandu A (2009) Outcomes of dental implants placed in a surgical training programme. Aust Dent J 54:361–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2009.01163.x - DOI - PubMed
-
- Melo MD, Shafie H, Obeid G (2006) Implant survival rates for oral and maxillofacial surgery residents: a retrospective clinical review with analysis of resident level of training on implant survival. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64:1185–1189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.04.014 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Cakarer S, Selvi F, Can T et al (2014) Investigation of the risk factors associated with the survival rate of dental implants. Implant Dent 23:328–333. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000079 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Aghaloo T, Pi-Anfruns J, Moshaverinia A, Sim D, Grogan T, Hadaya D (2019) The effects of systemic diseases and medications on implant osseointegration: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 34:s35–s49. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.19suppl.g3 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Monje A, Catena A, Borgnakke WS (2017) Association between diabetes mellitus/hyperglycaemia and peri-implant diseases: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol 44:636–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12724 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
