Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Jun;26(3):901-909.
doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02524-3. Epub 2021 Oct 22.

Randomized control trial evaluating the use of a shared decision-making aid for older ventral hernia patients in the Geriatric Assessment and Medical Preoperative Screening (GrAMPS) Program

B S Kushner  1 , T Holden  2 , B Han  3 , M Sehnert  3 , A Majumder  3 , J A Blatnik  3 , S E Holden  3
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomized control trial evaluating the use of a shared decision-making aid for older ventral hernia patients in the Geriatric Assessment and Medical Preoperative Screening (GrAMPS) Program

B S Kushner et al. Hernia. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: Shared decision making (SDM) is ideally suited to abdominal wall surgery in older adults given the breadth of decision making required by the hernia surgeon and the impact on quality of life (QOL) by various treatment options. Given the paucity of literature surrounding SDM in hernia patients, the feasibility of a novel, formalized SDM aid/tool was evaluated in a pilot randomized trial.

Methods: Patients 60 years or older with a diagnosed ventral hernia were prospectively randomized at an academic hernia center. In the experimental arm, a novel SDM tool, based on the SHARE Approach, guided the consultation. Previously validated SDM assessments and patient's hernia knowledge retention was measured.

Results: Eighteen (18) patients were randomized (9 control and 9 experimental). Cohorts were well matched in age (p = 0.51), comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Score: p = 0.43) and frailty (mFI-11: p = 0.19; Risk Analysis Index: p = 0.33). Consultation time was 11 min longer in the experimental cohort (p < 0.01). There was a trend towards better Decisional Conflict Scores in the experimental group (p = 0.25) and the experimental cohort had improved post-visit retained hernia knowledge (p < 0.01). All patients in the experimental arm (100%) enjoyed working through the SDM aid/tool and felt it was a worthwhile exercise.

Conclusion: Incorporating a formalized SDM tool into a busy hernia surgical practice is feasible and well received by patients. In addition, early results suggest it improves retention of basic hernia knowledge and may reduce patient's decisional conflict. Next steps include condensing the SDM tool to enhance efficiency within the clinic and beginning a large, randomized control trial.

Keywords: Age; Frailty; Geriatric syndromes; Inguinal hernia; Mild cognitive impairment; Shared decision making; Ventral hernias.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kushner B et al (2020) A practical guideline for the implementation of shared decision-making in complex ventral incisional hernia repair. J Surg Res 259:387–392 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Myckatyn TM et al (2020) Challenges and solutions for the implementation of shared decision-making in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 8(2):e2645 - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Mulley AG, Trimble C, Elwyn G (2012) Stop the silent misdiagnosis: patients’ preferences matter. BMJ 345:e6572 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Ubbink DT, Santema TB, Lapid O (2016) Shared decision-making in cosmetic medicine and aesthetic surgery. Aesthet Surg J 36(1):NP14-9 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Warner DO et al (2015) Decision aid for cigarette smokers scheduled for elective surgery. Anesthesiology 123(1):18–28 - PubMed - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources