Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Feb 1;13(1):248-268.
doi: 10.1093/advances/nmab112.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Portion Size and Ingestive Frequency on Energy Intake and Body Weight among Adults in Randomized Controlled Feeding Trials

Meta-Analysis

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Portion Size and Ingestive Frequency on Energy Intake and Body Weight among Adults in Randomized Controlled Feeding Trials

Kelly A Higgins et al. Adv Nutr. .

Abstract

Energy intake is the product of portion size (PS)-the energy content of an ingestive event-and ingestive frequency (IF)-the number of ingestive events per unit time. An uncompensated alteration in either PS or IF would result in a change in energy intake and body weight if maintained over time. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the independent effects of PS and IF on energy intake and body weight among healthy adults in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A total of 9708 articles were identified in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and CINAHL databases. The articles were divided among 10 researchers; each article was screened for eligibility by 2-3 independent reviewers. Exclusion criteria included: populations <19 y and >65 y, unhealthy populations (i.e. participants with an acute or chronic disease), assessments <24 h and <4 wk in duration for trials investigating energy intake or body weight, respectively. Controlled feeding trials (i.e. fixed energy intake) that manipulated IF and PS in the same study intervention (IF/PS) were evaluated separately and for the body weight outcome only. Twenty-two studies (IF = 4, PS = 14, IF/PS = 4) met the inclusion criteria. There was an insufficient number of studies to assess the effect of IF, PS, or IF/PS on body weight. There was heterogeneity in the effect sizes among all comparisons (I2 ≥75%). Consuming larger portion sizes was associated with higher daily energy intake [295 kcal (202, 388), n = 24; weighted mean differences (WMD) (95% CI), n = comparisons], and increased frequency of ingestive events was associated with higher energy intake [203 kcal (76, 330), n = 10]. Results from RCTs support that larger PS and greater IF are both associated with higher energy consumption. However, there is insufficient information to determine chronic effects on body weight. This protocol was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) as CRD42018104757.

Keywords: feeding pattern; food intake; healthy population; ingestive behavior; normal weight; obese; overweight; serving size.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow diagram of articles included in systematic review. *Exclusion rationale for references included in Supplemental Table 2. Additional study design information and results for 1 PS and energy intake trial (41) were reported in a publication not identified in the literature search (49); information from this publication was used in this systematic review. Information from 1 trial reported in 2 articles (41, 49); 2 trials reported in 1 article (37). EI, energy intake; IF, ingestive frequency; PS, portion size.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Forest plot of the effect of portion size on energy intake. ED, energy density; ES, effect size; F, female; M, male; PS, portion size; Red, reduced; SS, standard size; Stand, standard.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hales CM, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Ogden CL. Prevalence of obesity and severe obesity among adults: United States, 2017–2018. NCHS Data Brief, no 360. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics; 2020. - PubMed
    1. Piernas C, Popkin BM. Food portion patterns and trends among U.S. children and the relationship to total eating occasion size, 1977–2006. J Nutr. 2011;141(6):1159–64. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nielsen SJ, Popkin BM. Patterns and trends in food portion sizes, 1977–1998. JAMA. 2003;289(4):450–3. - PubMed
    1. Duffey KJ, Popkin BM. Energy density, portion size, and eating occasions: contributions to increased energy intake in the United States, 1977–2006. PLoS Med. 2011;8(6):e1001050. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kant AK, Graubard BI. 40-year trends in meal and snack eating behaviors of American adults. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2015;115(1):50–63. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types