Factors correlated with the optimal tension for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using Grasper Tensioning Attachment
- PMID: 34687919
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.10.004
Factors correlated with the optimal tension for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using Grasper Tensioning Attachment
Erratum in
-
Erratum to: Factors correlated with the optimal tension for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a grasper tensioning attachment [J Shoulder Elbow Surgery 2022;31:e213-e222. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.10.004].J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Sep;32(9):e475. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.06.001. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023. PMID: 37597921 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Little is known about the optimal tension in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). This study aimed to identify preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors that correlate with the tension in ARCR and to determine the optimal intraoperative tension using Grasper Tensioning Attachment, a tension meter attached to the common arthroscopic surgical grasper.
Methods: This study included 63 patients with a mean age at surgery of 65.3 years (range, 45-83 years) who underwent ARCR. The mean follow-up period was 24.1 months (range, 24-28 months). We investigated the patients' demographic data, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, DeOrio and Cofield classification, and Goutallier stage of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles. We also evaluated cuff integrity based on the Sugaya classification via magnetic resonance imaging. The free edge of the torn retracted tendon was grasped, and the passive tension to the footprint was then measured with Grasper Tensioning Attachment with the arm at the side. The anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) diameters were also measured.
Results: The preoperative Goutallier stage of the supraspinatus muscle was stage 0 in 7 cases, stage 1 in 34, stage 2 in 20, and stage 3 in 2. The mean intraoperative rotator repair tension was 10.0 ± 2.5 N (range, 7.5-17 N). The mean AP diameter of the rotator cuff tear was 22 ± 10 mm (range, 8-50 mm), and the mean ML diameter was 24 ± 10 mm (range, 10-50 mm). Age, DeOrio and Cofield classification, Goutallier stage, AP diameter, and ML diameter correlated with rotator repair tension. The rotator repair tension in Sugaya classification type III or IV cases (n = 12, 11.4 ± 2.4 N) was significantly larger than that in type I or II cases (n = 51, 9.7 ± 2.4 N; P = .03). Tension ≥ 10 N as a cutoff value from receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was a risk factor for poor cuff integrity (95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.88).
Conclusions: Rotator repair tension ≥ 10 N was a risk factor for poor cuff integrity. Thus, care should be taken when performing intraoperative procedures and administering postoperative regimens.
Keywords: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR); Grasper Tensioning Attachment; anchors; clinical assessment; diameter of rotator cuff tear; double-anchor footprint fixation (DAFF); multivariate logistic regression analysis; risk factors; tension.
Copyright © 2021 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
