Activity-based, genome-resolved metagenomics uncovers key populations and pathways involved in subsurface conversions of coal to methane
- PMID: 34689183
- PMCID: PMC8941128
- DOI: 10.1038/s41396-021-01139-x
Activity-based, genome-resolved metagenomics uncovers key populations and pathways involved in subsurface conversions of coal to methane
Abstract
Microbial metabolisms and interactions that facilitate subsurface conversions of recalcitrant carbon to methane are poorly understood. We deployed an in situ enrichment device in a subsurface coal seam in the Powder River Basin (PRB), USA, and used BONCAT-FACS-Metagenomics to identify translationally active populations involved in methane generation from a variety of coal-derived aromatic hydrocarbons. From the active fraction, high-quality metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) were recovered for the acetoclastic methanogen, Methanothrix paradoxum, and a novel member of the Chlorobi with the potential to generate acetate via the Pta-Ack pathway. Members of the Bacteroides and Geobacter also encoded Pta-Ack and together, all four populations had the putative ability to degrade ethylbenzene, phenylphosphate, phenylethanol, toluene, xylene, and phenol. Metabolic reconstructions, gene analyses, and environmental parameters also indicated that redox fluctuations likely promote facultative energy metabolisms in the coal seam. The active "Chlorobi PRB" MAG encoded enzymes for fermentation, nitrate reduction, and multiple oxygenases with varying binding affinities for oxygen. "M. paradoxum PRB" encoded an extradiol dioxygenase for aerobic phenylacetate degradation, which was also present in previously published Methanothrix genomes. These observations outline underlying processes for bio-methane from subbituminous coal by translationally active populations and demonstrate activity-based metagenomics as a powerful strategy in next generation physiology to understand ecologically relevant microbial populations.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International Society for Microbial Ecology.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Colosimo F, Thomas R, Lloyd JR, Taylor KG, Boothman C, Smith AD, et al. Biogenic methane in shale gas and coal bed methane: a review of current knowledge and gaps. Int J Coal Geol. 2016;165:106–20.
-
- Strąpoć D, Mastalerz M, Dawson K, Macalady J, Callaghan AV, Wawrik B, et al. Biogeochemistry of microbial coal-bed methane. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci. 2011;39:617–56.
-
- Barnhart EP, Davis KJ, Varonka M, Orem W, Cunningham AB, Ramsay BD, et al. Enhanced coal-dependent methanogenesis coupled with algal biofuels: Potential water recycle and carbon capture. Int J Coal Geol. 2017;171:69–75.
-
- Pachauri RK, Allen MR, Barros VR, Broome J, Cramer W, Christ R, et al. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2014. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland.
