Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 30;19(4):653-668.
doi: 10.9758/cpn.2021.19.4.653.

Improved Executive Functions and Reduced Craving in Youths with Methamphetamine Addiction: Evidence from Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation with Mindfulness Treatment

Affiliations

Improved Executive Functions and Reduced Craving in Youths with Methamphetamine Addiction: Evidence from Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation with Mindfulness Treatment

Jaber Alizadehgoradel et al. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. .

Abstract

Objective: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and mindfulness practices have been proposed as a potential approach to improve executive functions (EFs) and reduce craving in persons with substance use disorders. Based on the neural mechanisms of action of each of these interventions, the combination of both non-pharmacological interventions might have additive effects. In the current study, the effects of tDCS combined with mindfulness-based substance abuse treatment (MBSAT) to improve EFs and reduce craving were investigated in early abstinent methamphetamine abuse.

Methods: Eighty (youths aged between 18 and 21) early-abstinent methamphetamine users were randomly assigned to the research groups (tDCS group [n = 20], mindfulness group [n = 20], combined mindfulness-tDCS group [n = 20], and sham group [n = 20]). Active tDCS (1.5 mA,20 min, 12 sessions) or sham tDCS was appliedover the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the MBSAT protocol was used over twelve 50-min sessions.

Results: Both in the post-test phase (immediately after the intervention) and follow-up phase (one month after the intervention), performance in most EFs tasks significantly improved in the combination group which received real tDCS + MBSAT, as compared to baseline values and sham stimulation group. Similarly, a significant reduction in craving was observed after intervention inall treatment groups, but not the sham stimulation group. Interestingly, the increase in EFs and the reduction in craving post versus pre tDCS + MBSAT intervention were correlated.

Conclusion: Findings from the current study provide initial support for the clinical effectiveness of combination tDCS + MBSAT, possibly influencing cognitive/affective processes.

Keywords: Executive functions; Mindfulness; Substance-related disorders; Transcranial direct current stimulation; Youths.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of study inclusion. tDCS, transcranial direct current stimulation; MBSAT, mindfulness-based substance abuse treatment.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Pictures of the executive function tasks: The 1-back (A), WCST (B), BART (C) and Go-No-Go (D). All computerized tasks were presented on a 15.6” screen in counterbalanced order. WCST, Wisconsin Card Sorting Task; BART, Balloon Analogue Risk Task.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Performance in the EF tasks (N-back, WCST, BART and Go/ No-GO) and craving before the intervention, after the intervention and 1-month following intervention in research groups (tDCS, MBSAT, PIN-CODES, and sham). tDCS: real tDCS group, sham: sham tDCS group. tDCS, transcranial direct current stimulation; PIN-CODES, psychological interventions combined with direct electrical stimulation; MBSAT, mindfulness-based substance abuse treatment; WCST, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test; BART, Balloon Analogue Risk Task; DDQ, Desires for Drug Questionnaire.

References

    1. Bari A, DiCesare J, Babayan D, Runcie M, Sparks H, Wilson B. Neuromodulation for substance addiction in human subjects: a review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018;95:33–43. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.09.013. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE, Miech RA. Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2015: volume II, college students and adults ages 19-55; Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan; Ann Arbor. 2016.
    1. Volkow ND, Koob GF, McLellan AT. Neurobiologic advances from the brain disease model of addiction. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:363–371. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1511480. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Domínguez-Salas S, Díaz-Batanero C, Lozano-Rojas OM, Verdejo-García A. Impact of general cognition and executive function deficits on addiction treatment outcomes: systematic review and discussion of neurocognitive pathways. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;71:772–801. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.09.030. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pentz MA, Spruijt-Metz D, Chou CP, Riggs NR. High calorie, low nutrient food/beverage intake and video gaming in children as potential signals for addictive behavior. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8:4406–4424. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8124406. - DOI - PMC - PubMed