Health Technology Assessment of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products: Comparison Among 3 European Countries
- PMID: 34690785
- PMCID: PMC8531540
- DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.755052
Health Technology Assessment of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products: Comparison Among 3 European Countries
Abstract
Even for centrally approved products, each European country is responsible for the effective national market access. This step can result in inequalities in terms of access, due to different opinions about the therapeutic value assessed by health technology assessment (HTA) bodies. Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) represent a major issue with regard to the HTA in order to make them available at a national level. These products are based on genes, tissues, or cells, commonly developed as one-shot treatment for rare or ultrarare diseases and mandatorily authorized by the EMA with a central procedure. This study aims to provide a comparative analysis of HTA recommendations issued by European countries (France, Germany, and Italy) following EMA approval of ATMPs. We found a low rate of agreement on the therapeutic value (in particular the "added value" compared to the standard of care) of ATMPs. Despite the differences in terms of clinical assessment, the access has been usually guaranteed, even with different timing and limitations. In view of the importance of ATMPs as innovative therapies for unmet needs, it is crucial to understand and act on the causes of disagreement among the HTA. In addition, the adoption of the new EU regulation on HTA would be useful to reduce disparities of medicine's assessment among European countries.
Keywords: access; added therapeutic value; advanced medicinal products; health technology assessment; regulatory issue.
Copyright © 2021 Gozzo, Romano, Romano, Brancati, Longo, Vitale and Drago.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
-
- 648 L. Conversione in legge del decreto-legge 21 ottobre 1996 n (1996). 536, recante misure per il contenimento della spesa farmaceutica e la rideterminazione del tetto di spesa per l’anno. Available at: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/atto/serie_generale/caricaDettaglioAtto... (Accessed August, 2021).
-
- AIFA. Regime di rimborsabilità e prezzo del medicinale per uso umano «Zolgensma». (Determina n. DG/277/2021). (21A01554) (GU n.62 del 13-3-2021). Available at: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/atto/stampa/serie_generale/originario .
-
- AIFA (2021). Report innovatività Zolgensma. Det. n. 277 del 10/03/2021 GU Serie Generale n. 62 del 13/03/2021. Available at: https://www.aifa.gov.it/farmaci-innovativi (Accessed march, 2021).
-
- AIFA (2017). Determina dell’agenzia italiana del farmaco, 31 marzoCriteri per la classificazione dei farmaci innovativi e dei farmaci oncologici innovativi ai sensi dell’articolo 1, comma 402, della legge 11 dicembre 2016, 232. Determina n. 519/2017.
-
- AIFA. Inserimento del medicinale Zolgensma (Onasemnogene abeparvovec) nell’elenco dei medicinali erogabili a totale carico del Servizio sanitario nazionale ai sensi della legge 23 dicembre 1996, n. 648, per il trattamento entro i primi sei mesi di vita di pazienti con diagnosi genetica (mutazione biallelica nel gene SMN1 e fino a 2 copie del gene SMN2) o diagnosi clinica di atrofia muscolare spinale di tipo 1 (SMA 1). (Determina n. 126266/2020). (20A06264) (GU n.286 del 17-11-2020). Available at: https://www.aifa.gov.it/documents/20142/961234/Determina_AIFA-126266-202... (Accessed August, 2021).
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources