Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Sep;16(3):501-525.
doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2021.108800. Epub 2021 Aug 28.

Complications in laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery: definitions, classifications, incidence and risk factors - an up-to-date review

Affiliations
Review

Complications in laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery: definitions, classifications, incidence and risk factors - an up-to-date review

Rafał Watrowski et al. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Almost all gynecological and general-surgical operations are - or can be - performed laparoscopically. In comparison to an abdominal approach, the minimally invasive access offers several advantages; however, laparoscopy (both conventional and robotic-assisted) can be associated with a number of approach-specific complications. Although the majority of them are related to the laparoscopic entry, adverse events may also occur due to the presence of pneumoperitoneum or the use of laparoscopic instruments. Unfortunately, a high proportion of complications (especially affecting the bowel and ureter) remain unrecognized during surgery. This narrative review provides comprehensive up-to-date information about definitions, classifications, risk factors and incidence of surgical complications in conventional and robotic-assisted laparoscopy, with a special focus on gynecology. The topic is discussed from various perspectives, e.g. in the context of stage of surgery, injured organs, involved instruments, and in relation to malpractice claims.

Keywords: classification; complications; gynecological laparoscopy; incidence; risk factors; robotic-assisted surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alkatout I, Biebl M. Recent advances in laparoscopy. J Clin Med. 2021;10:131. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen R, Su Z, Yang L, et al. The effects and costs of laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy in patients with uterine fibroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Surg. 2020;20:55. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baggish MS. Major laparoscopic complications: a review in two parts. J Gynecol Surg. 2012;28:315–32.
    1. Keller DS, Delaney CP, Hashemi L, et al. A national evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes in open versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:4220–8. - PubMed
    1. Capozzi VA, Sozzi G, Gambino G, et al. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for surgical treatment of obese women with endometrial cancer: a cost-benefit comparative analysis. Mol Clin Oncol. 2019;11:335–42. - PMC - PubMed