Effects of anchoring sutures at diverting ileostomy after rectal cancer surgery on peritoneal adhesion at following ileostomy reversal
- PMID: 34692593
- PMCID: PMC8506021
- DOI: 10.4174/astr.2021.101.4.214
Effects of anchoring sutures at diverting ileostomy after rectal cancer surgery on peritoneal adhesion at following ileostomy reversal
Abstract
Purpose: During diverting ileostomy reversal for rectal cancer patients who underwent previous sphincter-saving surgery, the extent of adhesion formation around the ileostomy site affects operative and postoperative outcomes. Anchoring sutures placed at the time of the ileostomy procedure may reduce adhesions around the ileostomy. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of anchoring sutures on the degree of adhesion formation and the postoperative course at the time of ileostomy reversal.
Methods: Patients who underwent sphincter-saving surgery with diverting ileostomy for rectal cancer between January 2013 and December 2017 were enrolled. Variables including the peritoneal dhesion index (PAI) score, operation time, the length of resected small bowel, operative complications, and postoperative hospital stay were collected prospectively and compared between the anchoring group (AG) and non-anchoring group (NAG).
Results: A total of 90 patients were included in this study, with 60 and 30 patients in the AG and NAG, respectively. The AG had shorter mean operation time (46.88 ± 16.37 minutes vs. 61.53 ± 19.36 minutes, P = 0.001) and lower mean PAI score (3.02 ± 2.53 vs. 5.80 ± 2.60, P = 0.001), compared with the NAG. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the AG and NAG (5.0% vs. 13.3%, respectively; P = 0.240).
Conclusion: Anchoring sutures at the formation of a diverting ileostomy could decrease the adhesion score and operation time at ileostomy reversal, thus may be effective in improving perioperative outcomes.
Keywords: Adhesion; Ileostomy; Postoperative complications; Rectal neoplasms.
Copyright © 2021, the Korean Surgical Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Risk factors for complications after diverting ileostomy closure in patients who have undergone rectal cancer surgery.Surg Today. 2017 Oct;47(10):1238-1242. doi: 10.1007/s00595-017-1510-1. Epub 2017 Mar 31. Surg Today. 2017. PMID: 28364398
-
Feasibility and safety of a fold-over diverting ileostomy reversal after rectal cancer surgery: case-matched comparison to the resection technique.Ann Coloproctol. 2014 Jun;30(3):118-21. doi: 10.3393/ac.2014.30.3.118. Epub 2014 Jun 23. Ann Coloproctol. 2014. PMID: 24999462 Free PMC article.
-
Study protocol: a multicenter randomized controlled trial of the multifaceted workload reduction of the anti-adhesion barrier for diverting ileostomy in laparoscopic rectal surgery, YCOG 2005 (ADOBARRIER study).Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Dec;36(12):2763-2768. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-04032-3. Epub 2021 Sep 20. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021. PMID: 34545454
-
Loop ileostomy reversal after laparoscopic versus open rectal resection.ANZ J Surg. 2019 Mar;89(3):E52-E55. doi: 10.1111/ans.14879. Epub 2018 Oct 8. ANZ J Surg. 2019. PMID: 30294847
-
Postoperative morbidity and mortality after anterior resection with preventive diverting loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for rectal cancer: A updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Jul;47(7):1514-1525. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.01.030. Epub 2021 Feb 18. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33622575
Cited by
-
Small Bowel Obstruction After Neonatal Repair of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia-Incidence and Risk-Factors Identified in a Large Longitudinal Cohort-Study.Front Pediatr. 2022 May 17;10:846630. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.846630. eCollection 2022. Front Pediatr. 2022. PMID: 35656380 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of pain-education nursing based on a mind map on postoperative pain score and quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer.Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 May 12;102(19):e33562. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033562. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023. PMID: 37171350 Free PMC article.
-
Micro video incentive nursing intervention improves the psychological state and quality of life in patients with rectal cancer after enterostomy.Am J Transl Res. 2023 Mar 15;15(3):2040-2048. eCollection 2023. Am J Transl Res. 2023. PMID: 37056851 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Parker MC, Wilson MS, van Goor H, Moran BJ, Jeekel J, Duron JJ, et al. Adhesions and colorectal surgery: call for action. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9 Suppl 2:66–72. - PubMed
-
- Cohen Z, Senagore AJ, Dayton MT, Koruda MJ, Beck DE, Wolff BG, et al. Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a novel, glycerol/sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose-based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective, randomized, evaluator-blinded multicenter study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1130–1139. - PubMed
-
- Kössi JA, Salminen PT, Laato MK. Surgical workload and cost of postoperative adhesion-related intestinal obstruction: importance of previous surgery. World J Surg. 2004;28:666–670. - PubMed
-
- Hanna MH, Vinci A, Pigazzi A. Diverting ileostomy in colorectal surgery: when is it necessary? Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015;400:145–152. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources