Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 25:38:100868.
doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2021.100868. eCollection 2021 Nov.

A qualitative study on the impact of long-distance travel for gynecologic cancer care

Vaidehi Mujumdar  1 , Timberly R Butler  2 , David I Shalowitz  3   4
Affiliations

A qualitative study on the impact of long-distance travel for gynecologic cancer care

Vaidehi Mujumdar et al. Gynecol Oncol Rep. .

Abstract

Background: Women with gynecologic malignancies experience improved clinical outcomes when they are treated by gynecologic oncologists and in high-volume cancer centers. However, geography is a major barrier to high-volume care for patients. This qualitative study was undertaken to identify facilitators and barriers to patients traveling long distances for gynecologic cancer care.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 women with gynecologic malignancies traveling >50 miles for treatment at Wake Forest Comprehensive Cancer Center. Eight interviews included caregivers. Four interview domains focused on personal challenges and coping strategies related to accessing cancer care.

Results: Mean distance traveled for care was 87 miles (range: 54-218). Most participants reported that recommendations from physicians, friends, and family motivated travel. 10/19 participants were aware of closer sites for cancer care; 5 had unfavorable experiences elsewhere. Barriers to travel included time, cost, childcare, difficulty navigating, and physical discomfort. Social support was an important facilitator of travel for care; some patients utilized loaned money or vehicles. Participants reported significant energy expenditure scheduling travel, coordinating time off work, and arranging overnight stays near the cancer center. Suggestions for care improvement included travel vouchers, transportation assistance, signage and personnel to help with navigation, and appointments later in the day. Participants supported in-person oncologist outreach to rural areas and appointments via telemedicine; few preferred the current infrastructure.

Conclusion: Patients who travel long distances for gynecologic cancer care encounter significant burdens and rely heavily on social and financial support. Interventions should be developed and evaluated to reduce the burden of long-distance travel and develop efficient methods of outreach, including telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Barrington D.A., Dilley S.E., Landers E.E. Distance from a comprehensive cancer center: a proxy for poor cervical cancer outcomes? Gynecol. Oncol. 2016;143(3):617–621. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bristow R.E., Chang J., Ziogas A., Anton-Culver H., Vieira V.M. Spatial analysis of adherence to treatment guidelines for advanced-stage ovarian cancer and the impact of race and socioeconomic status. Gynecol. Oncol. 2014;134(1):60–67. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.03.561. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gunderson C.C., Tergas A.I., Fleury A.C., Diaz-Montes T.P., Giuntoli R.L. Primary uterine cancer in Maryland: impact of distance on access to surgical care at high-volume hospitals. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2013;23(7):1244–1251. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31829ea002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gunderson C.C., Nugent E.K., McMeekin D.S., Moore K.N. Distance traveled for treatment of cervical cancer: who travels the farthest, and does it impact outcome? Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2013;23(6):1099–1103. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e3182989464. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liang M.I., Pisu M., Summerlin S.S., Boitano T.K.L., Blanchard C.T., Bhatia S., Huh W.K. Extensive financial hardship among gynecologic cancer patients starting a new line of therapy. Gynecol. Oncol. 2020;156(2):271–277. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.11.022. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources