Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 20;7(4):649-653.
doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2021.08.003. eCollection 2021 Dec.

Partial open conversion with proximal aortic banding and endograft preservation is a safe option for the treatment of persistent type II endoleaks

Affiliations

Partial open conversion with proximal aortic banding and endograft preservation is a safe option for the treatment of persistent type II endoleaks

Thomas Staniszewski et al. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. .

Abstract

We have described our technique of open partial conversion (OPC; n = 5) with aortic banding and endograft preservation for the treatment of type II endoleaks. OPC significantly reduced the aortic clamping time (5.0 vs 32.5 minutes; P = .01) relative to endograft explantation (n = 2). Cross-clamping was avoided entirely in three of the procedures. The patients treated with OPC showed a trend toward a decreased operative time (4.8 vs 5.9 hours) and shorter hospital stay (5.7 vs 7.4 days). Follow-up computed tomography scans were available for three of the five OPC patients, which showed resolution of the type II endoleak. The findings from the present study have further demonstrated the safety of OPC for the treatment of type II endoleaks.

Keywords: Aneurysm; Endograft explant; Endograft preservation; Endoleak.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Exposure of the abdominal aorta and encirclement of the aortic neck with a felt strip (arrow). The patient's head is to the left of the image.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Completed felt banding of the proximal aortic neck (arrow).
Fig 3
Fig 3
The sac was opened and any back-bleeding vessels were identified and oversewn (arrows).
Fig 4
Fig 4
After excision of the redundant aneurysm wall, the sac was closed over the endograft.

Comment in

  • Reply.
    Pu Q, Rhee R. Pu Q, et al. J Vasc Surg. 2023 Sep;78(3):841. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.03.495. J Vasc Surg. 2023. PMID: 37599039 No abstract available.

References

    1. Mohapatra A., Robinson D., Malak O., Madigan M.C., Avgerinos E.D., Chaer R.A. Increasing use of open conversion for late complications after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69:1766–1775. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bang S.H., Jang I.S. Surgical experience of persistent type 2 endoleaks with aneurysmal sac enlargement after endovascular aneurysm repair. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;47:167–170. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lal B.K., Zhou W., Li Z., Kyriakides T., Matsumura J., Lederle F.A. Predictors and outcomes of endoleaks in the Veterans Affairs open versus endovascular repair (OVER) trial of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2015;62:1394–1404. - PubMed
    1. Madigan M.C., Singh M.J., Chaer R.A., Al-Khoury G.E., Makaroun M.S. Occult type I or III endoleaks are a common cause of failure of type II endoleak treatment after endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69:432–439. - PubMed
    1. Yamada M., Takahashi H., Tauchi Y., Satoh H., Matsuda H. Open surgical repair can be one option for the treatment of persistent type II endoleak after EVAR. Ann Vasc Dis. 2015;8:210–214. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources