What drives low-carbon agriculture? The experience of farms from the Wielkopolska region in Poland
- PMID: 34694556
- PMCID: PMC8882097
- DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-17022-3
What drives low-carbon agriculture? The experience of farms from the Wielkopolska region in Poland
Abstract
Because of global environmental problems, low-carbon agriculture has gained increasing importance both in developed and developing countries. Hence, there is a need to find ways to develop more efficient agricultural systems. The purpose of this article is to identify the drivers of low-carbon agriculture on farms in the Wielkopolska region (in Poland). We aimed to take an original approach to investigate low-carbon agriculture with a unique set of different economic and environmental variables and contribute to the literature, which is not very extensive in terms of microeconomic research, including research on farmers in the Wielkopolska region. Therefore, we employed a multiple-factor measurement model for structural equation modeling (SEM) of data collected individually from 120 farms in 2020. As a result, we formulated the following conclusions: the increasing productivity of factors (land, labor, and capital) have a positive effect on low-carbon farming, just as increasing fertilizer and energy efficiency. Moreover, thermal insulation is also important for low-carbon agriculture, with efficiency of fertilizer use being the most important factor. We believe that the issues of farm use of fertilizers and thermal insulation of buildings should be more broadly included in energy policy, both at the national and the European Union (EU) levels. Some of these factors however are already present in the common agricultural policy (CAP) for 2021-2027.
Keywords: Agricultural efficiency; Energy; Fertilizers; Low-carbon agriculture; Productivity; Structural equation modeling (SEM); The Wielkopolska region.
© 2021. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Effect of agricultural subsidies on the use of chemical fertilizer.J Environ Manage. 2021 Dec 1;299:113621. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113621. Epub 2021 Aug 27. J Environ Manage. 2021. PMID: 34461463
-
Sustainability assessment of different land tenure farming systems in tea farming: The effect of decisional and structural variables.Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2021 Jul;17(4):814-834. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4379. Epub 2021 Feb 8. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2021. PMID: 33289323
-
Organic Farming as an Alternative Maintenance Strategy in the Opinion of Farmers from Natura 2000 Areas.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 23;19(7):3793. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073793. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35409477 Free PMC article.
-
Carbon sequestration in European croplands.SEB Exp Biol Ser. 2005:47-55. SEB Exp Biol Ser. 2005. PMID: 17633030 Review.
-
A paradigm shift to CO2 sequestration to manage global warming - With the emphasis on developing countries.Sci Total Environ. 2021 Oct 10;790:148169. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148169. Epub 2021 Jun 1. Sci Total Environ. 2021. PMID: 34380249 Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of Farmers' Awareness of Climate Change on Their Willingness to Adopt Low-Carbon Production: Based on the TAM-SOR Model.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 29;20(1):619. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010619. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36612940 Free PMC article.
-
Genetic resources and precise gene editing for targeted improvement of barley abiotic stress tolerance.J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2023 Jul 3;24(12):1069-1092. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B2200552. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2023. PMID: 38057266 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Alvarado R, Tillaguango B, Dagar V, Ahmad M, Işık C, Méndez P, Toledo E (2021) Ecological footprint, economic complexity and natural resources rents in Latin America: empirical evidence using quantile regressions. J Clean Prod. 318. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128585
-
- Anghel I, Siminica M, Cristea M, Noja GG, Sichigea M. Bioeconomy credentials and intellectual capital: a comparative modeling approach for the E.U.-13 and E.U.-15. Econ. Res. – Ekon. Istraz. 2019;32:2699–2722. doi: 10.1080/1331677X.2019.1653212. - DOI
-
- Bonfiglio A, Arzeni A, Bodini A. Assessing eco-efficiency of arable farms in rural areas. Agr Syst. 2017;151:114–125. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.11.008. - DOI
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous