Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Dec;14(6):369-377.
doi: 10.1007/s12178-021-09722-7. Epub 2021 Oct 25.

The Use of Intraoperative Digital Radiography Alignment Software to Assess Implant Placement in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Affiliations
Review

The Use of Intraoperative Digital Radiography Alignment Software to Assess Implant Placement in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Jacob P Siebenmorgen et al. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a highly successful surgery with growing rates of utilization in the USA, but surgical outliers leading to postoperative complications remain a concern. There is need for a standard system of accurate, predictable intraoperative evaluation to decrease component positioning outliers. Many current intraoperative imaging systems have shown promise, but there are drawbacks that have led to slow adoption. Digital radiography, in conjunction with Radlink™ technology, is a potential solution to this problem. This review summarizes the clinical application and scientific literature regarding the use of Radlink™ in THA.

Recent findings: Traditional surgeon-directed component placement can result in surgical outliers. This is especially true not only among low-volume arthroplasty surgeons, but can also occur with experienced, high-volume surgeons. Digital radiography allows for more precise and accurate placement of the acetabular cup in a targeted range in an effort to improve THA outcomes. Intraoperative images are obtained quickly, and they are accurate when compared to postoperative images. Additionally, the use of Radlink™ results in a significant decrease in leg length and femoral offset outliers. The adoption of Radlink™ technology in THA can significantly decrease surgical outliers, especially errors in acetabular cup placement, leg length, and femoral offset. Digital radiography avoids many of the previous aversions to intraoperative imaging as it produces a fast, reliable image with little radiation exposure and minimal interruption to workflow. There is the potential for Radlink™ use to provide superior patient outcomes, as a decrease in surgical outliers can minimize implant malpositioning with resultant need for revision THAs. Radlink™ may also provide benefit in analyzing other parameters, such as component sizing.

Keywords: Component positioning; Digital radiography; Intraoperative imaging; Radlink; Total hip arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Jacob Siebenmorgen declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Jeff Stambough discloses the following conflicts: American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons: Board or committee member; American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR): Board or committee member; Journal of Arthroplasty: Editorial or governing board; Bone and Joint 360: Editorial or governing board; Signature Orthopaedics: IP royalties; Smith & Nephew: Paid consultant.

Benjamin Stronach discloses the following conflicts: American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons: Board or committee member; Bone and Joint 360: Editorial or governing board; Signature Orthopaedics: IP royalties; Tightline Development: IP royalties; Pacific Research: IP royalties; DJO Global: Paid consultant.

Simon Mears discloses the following conflicts: American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, Fragility Fracture Network: Board or committee member, Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society: Editorial or governing board; Delta Orthopedics, Stock

Simon C. Mears discloses Medical/Orthopaedic publications editorial/governing board (The following conflicts were disclosed) Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation.

Board member/committee appointments for a society (The following conflicts were disclosed) International Geriatric Fracture Society

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
RadlinkTM Tower set up in the operating room, where the top screen can project the preoperative anteroposterior pelvis X-ray and the bottom screen shows intraoperative images for comparison
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Pre-operative anteroposterior hip radiograph with templated surgical plan for component sizing and positioning
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Image acquisition positioning of a sterile covered digital receiver at the patient’s back and the X-ray machine aiming at patient’s anterior pelvis in the lateral decubitus position
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Evidence of a malrotated X-ray with the anatomic measures of the coccygeal tip in relation to the pubic symphysis using the sacroiliac joints as a horizontal reference in addition to determinations of leg length and offset
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Adjusted anteroposterior pelvis image and calculation of component positioning and anatomical relationships

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Singh JA, Yu S, Chen L, Cleveland JD. Rates of total joint replacement in the United States: Future projections to 2020-2040 using the national inpatient sample. The Journal of Rheumatology. 2019;46:1134–1140. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.170990. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li M, Glassman AH. What’s New in Hip Replacement. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume. 2018;100:1616–1624. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00583. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Karachalios T, Komnos G, Koutalos A. Total hip arthroplasty: Survival and modes of failure. EFORT Open Reviews. 2018;3:232–239. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170068. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Cabanela ME, Morrey BF. Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: Factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A. 2002;84:171–177. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200202000-00002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Söderman P, Malchau H, Herberts P. Outcome after total Hip Arthroplasty: Part I. General health evaluation in relation to definition of failure in the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty register. ActaOrthopaedicaScandinavica. 2000;71:354–359. doi: 10.1080/000164700317393330. - DOI - PubMed