Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 18;66(1):e0164921.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.01649-21. Epub 2021 Oct 25.

Synergy Mechanisms of Daptomycin-Fosfomycin Combinations in Daptomycin-Susceptible and -Resistant Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: In Vitro, Ex Vivo, and In Vivo Metrics

Affiliations

Synergy Mechanisms of Daptomycin-Fosfomycin Combinations in Daptomycin-Susceptible and -Resistant Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: In Vitro, Ex Vivo, and In Vivo Metrics

Nagendra N Mishra et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. .

Abstract

Increased usage of daptomycin (DAP) for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections has led to emergence of DAP-resistant (DAP-R) strains, resulting in treatment failures. DAP-fosfomycin (Fosfo) combinations are synergistically active against MRSA, although the mechanism(s) of this interaction is not fully understood. The current study explored four unique but likely interrelated activities of DAP-Fosfo combinations: (i) synergistic killing, (ii) prevention of evolution of DAP-R, (iii) resensitization of already DAP-R subpopulations to a DAP-susceptible (DAP-S) phenotype, and (iv) perturbations of specific cell envelope phenotypes known to correlate with DAP-R in MRSA. Using an isogenic DAP-S (CB1483)/DAP-R (CB185) clinical MRSA strain pair, we demonstrated that combinations of DAP plus Fosfo (DAP+Fosfo) (i) enhanced killing of both strains in vitro and ex vivo, (ii) increased target tissue clearances of the DAP-R strain in an in vivo model of experimental infective endocarditis (IE), (iii) prevented emergence of DAP-R in the DAP-S parental strain both in vitro and ex vivo, and (iv) resensitized the DAP-R strain to a DAP-S phenotype ex vivo. Phenotypically, following exposure to sub-MIC Fosfo, the DAP-S/DAP-R strain pair exhibited distinct modifications in (i) net positive surface charge (P < 0.05), (ii) quantity (P < 0.0001) and localization of cell membrane cardiolipin (CL), (iii) DAP surface binding, and (iv) membrane fluidity (P < 0.05). Furthermore, preconditioning this strain pair to DAP with or without Fosfo (DAP+/-Fosfo) sensitized these organisms to killing by the human host defense peptide LL37. These data underscore the notion that DAP-Fosfo combinations can impact MRSA clearances within multiple microenvironments, likely based on specific phenotypic adaptations.

Keywords: MRSA; Staphylococcus; combination; daptomycin; fosfomycin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Sublethal DAP+/−Fosfo (1× MIC of each antibiotic) killing of DAP-S/DAP-R MRSA strains in vitro. Arrows indicate the enhanced bactericidal synergistic killing impact of combination of DAP and Fosfo versus those of the single antibiotics.
FIG 2
FIG 2
DAP MICs of DAP-S/DAP-R strains serially passaged in DAP+Fosfo versus DAP alone in vitro. (A) DAP+Fosfo prevented selection of DAP-R; (B) DAP+Fosfo did not resensitize DAP-R CB185 to the DAP-S phenotype but prevented further MIC increases.
FIG 3
FIG 3
Fosfo facilitates synergistic killing significantly with DAP against DAP-S/DAP-R MRSA strains in an ex vivo IE model within simulated IE vegetations. Simulated model doses were DAP at 6 mg/kg every 24 h and/or Fosfo at 4 g every 8 h. *, P ≤ 0.05 for DAP+Fosfo versus the single antibiotics in both the DAP-S and DAP-R strains. Arrows highlight the increased bactericidal synergistic killing impact of combination of DAP and Fosfo versus those of the single antibiotics.
FIG 4
FIG 4
Exposure to DAP, Fosfo, and a combination of DAP and Fosfo at 0.5× MIC to DAP-S (CB1483) and DAP-R (CB185) MRSA strains impacts HDP (i.e., LL-37) susceptibility.
FIG 5
FIG 5
Surface charge of DAP-S CB1483/DAP-R CB185 S. aureus strains following exposure to 0.5× Fosfo MIC. *, P ≤ 0.05, and **, P ≤ 0.01, versus Fosfo-untreated strains. More residual cytochrome c present in the supernatant equates to a more positively charged surface.
FIG 6
FIG 6
(A) Quantification of BODIPY-DAP binding; (B) BODIPY-DAP binding localization by confocal microscopy in the DAP-S/DAP-R strain pair with Fosfo treatment. *, P < 0.001 in Fosfo-treated versus untreated organisms. Yellow arrows indicate areas of high BODIPY-DAP binding.
FIG 7
FIG 7
NAO fluorescence intensity (A) and NAO localization by microscopy (B) of DAP-S/DAP-R strain pair following subinhibitory Fosfo exposure. Green arrows indicate areas of high NAO localization.
FIG 8
FIG 8
CM fluidity of DAP-S CB1483/DAP-R CB185 S. aureus strains following exposure to 0.5× Fosfo MIC. *, P ≤ 0.05, and **, P ≤ 0.001, versus Fosfo-untreated strains. Lower PI values indicate higher CM fluidity.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Roch M, Gagetti P, Davis J, Ceriana P, Errecalde L, Corso A, Rosato AE. 2017. Daptomycin resistance in clinical MRSA strains is associated with a high biological fitness cost. Front Microbiol 8:2303. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02303. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rose WE, Fallon M, Moran JJ, Vanderloo JP. 2012. Vancomycin tolerance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: influence of vancomycin, daptomycin, and telavancin on differential resistance gene expression. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:4422–4427. 10.1128/AAC.00676-12. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marty FM, Yeh WW, Wennersten CB, Venkataraman L, Albano E, Alyea EP, Gold HS, Baden LR, Pillai SK. 2006. Emergence of a clinical daptomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolate during treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and osteomyelitis. J Clin Microbiol 44:595–597. 10.1128/JCM.44.2.595-597.2006. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sakoulas G, Rose W, Rybak MJ, Pillai S, Alder J, Moellering RC, Jr, Eliopoulos GM. 2008. Evaluation of endocarditis caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus developing nonsusceptibility to daptomycin. J Clin Microbiol 46:220–224. 10.1128/JCM.00660-07. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pujol M, Miró J-M, Shaw E, Aguado J-M, San-Juan R, Puig-Asensio M, Pigrau C, Calbo E, Montejo M, Rodriguez-Álvarez R, Garcia-Pais M-J, Pintado V, Escudero-Sánchez R, Lopez-Contreras J, Morata L, Montero M, Andrés M, Pasquau J, Arenas M-D-M, Padilla B, Murillas J, Jover-Sáenz A, López-Cortes L-E, García-Pardo G, Gasch O, Videla S, Hereu P, Tebé C, Pallarès N, Sanllorente M, Domínguez M-Á, Càmara J, Ferrer A, Padullés A, Cuervo G, Carratalà J, MRSA Bacteremia (BACSARM) Trial Investigators. 2021. Daptomycin plus fosfomycin versus daptomycin alone for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and endocarditis: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Infect Dis 72:1517–1525. 10.1093/cid/ciaa1081. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms