Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021:43:e2021090.
doi: 10.4178/epih.e2021090. Epub 2021 Oct 22.

The effect of peer support in diabetes self-management education on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Akhmad Azmiardi  1   2 , Bhisma Murti  1 , Ratih Puspita Febrinasari  3 , Didik Gunawan Tamtomo  1
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The effect of peer support in diabetes self-management education on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Akhmad Azmiardi et al. Epidemiol Health. 2021.

Abstract

Objectives: Diabetes self-management education (DSME) programs are a strategy to maintain healthy behaviors. Nevertheless, limited evidence has been reported from systematic evaluations of the effects of DSME integrated with peer support on glycemic control. This study aimed to review the effectiveness of DSME interventions integrated with peer support on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Methods: A systematic search was carried out in electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, SpringerLink, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Google Scholar, for English-language articles published from 2005 until 2020. The effect size was estimated as the standard mean difference (SMD). The Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool was employed to assess the risk of bias.

Results: Twelve studies were included in this study. DSME integrated with peer support effectively reduced glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels, with a statistically significant effect (SMD, -0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.69 to -0.13; p<0.001). Programs with a sample size <100 (SMD, -0.45; 95% CI, -0.79 to -0.11; p=0.009), duration of intervention ≤6 months (SMD, -0.52; 95% CI, -0.96 to -0.07; p=0.020), baseline HbA1c <8.5% (SMD, -0.42; 95% CI, -0.77 to -0.07; p=0.020), delivery by group (SMD, -0.28; 95% CI, -0.51 to -0.06; p=0.010), and high frequency of contact (SMD, -0.29; 95% CI, -0.48 to -0.10; p=0.003) had statistically significant effects on reducing HbA1c levels in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Conclusions: DSME integrated with peer support effectively enhances glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Programs with smaller participants groups, shorter interventions, weekly meetings, and closer group sessions improved glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Keywords: Meta-analysis; Peer support; Randomized controlled trial; Type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare for this study.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA (Preferred Report ing Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flowchart. DSME, diabetes self-management education; DM, diabetes mellitus; RCT, randomized controlled trial.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Forest plot of the overall included studies. DSME, diabetes self-management education; SD, standard deviation; CI, confidence interval.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, Malanda B, Karuranga S, Unwin N, et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;157:107843. - PubMed
    1. Introduction: standards of medical care in diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(Suppl 1):S1–S2. - PubMed
    1. Jiménez PG, Martín-Carmona J, Hernández EL. Diabetes mellitus. Medicine (Barcelona) 2020;13:883–890. (Spanish)
    1. Mata-Cases M, Franch-Nadal J, Gratacòs M, Mauricio D. Therapeutic inertia: still a long way to go that cannot be postponed. Diabetes Spectr. 2020;33:50–57. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khare J, Jindal S. Observational study on effect of lock down due to COVID 19 on glycemic control in patients with diabetes: experience from Central India. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14:1571–1574. - PMC - PubMed

Substances