Litigation after primary total hip and knee arthroplasties in France: review of legal actions over the past 30 years
- PMID: 34697655
- DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04228-w
Litigation after primary total hip and knee arthroplasties in France: review of legal actions over the past 30 years
Abstract
Introduction: Since the law of March 4, 2002, several modifications have impacted medical practices and their medico-legal implications. In case of an infectious complication not related to a fault of the practitioners (surgeons, anesthetists), the patient has the right to compensation assumed by the care structures. Moreover, the lack of preoperative information is no longer just a failing of the ethical standards but a breach of medical and legal obligations. Then, aims of this study were: (1) to describe the reasons for a lawsuit in France following total primary hip (THA) and total knee (TKA) arthroplasties and (2) to compare litigation characteristics of private and public practices.
Materials and methods: Civil (private practice) and administrative (public practice) court decisions in France between 1990 and 2020 were collected using the two main legal data sources (Legifrance, Doctrine).
Results: Eighty-three TKA and 173 THA cases were identified. Reasons for complaint in primary THA were mainly infection (29%), prosthetic failures (18%), nerves injuries (17%), and leg length discrepancies (11%). The main grounds for complaint in favor of the plaintiff were diagnostic or indication mistakes (100%), infections (80%), especially if a lack of information was recognized (88%). Reasons for complaint following primary TKA were mainly infections (65%) and persistent pain or stiffness (12%). Whatever the reason, the verdict was in favor of the plaintiff in about 2/3 of the cases. THAs were more at risk of appeal in administrative procedures than in civil (p = 0.008). There were more cases of implant failure in civil proceedings (p = 0.008). Indemnities after primary THA was higher in public activity litigation (p = 0.04). There were no differences in verdicts, grounds for complaints, and compensation between public and private practices for primary TKA.
Conclusion: The main complaint about all the arthroplasties in France was a septic complication. The lack of information could be an added pejorative element for the final verdict.
Keywords: France; Indemnity; Litigation; Malpractice; Total hip arthroplasty; Total knee arthroplasty.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Kremers HM, Larson DR, Crowson CS, Kremers WK, Washington RE, Steiner CA, Jiranek WA, Berry DJ (2015) Prevalence of total hip and knee replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97:1386–1397 - DOI
-
- Räsänen P, Paavolainen P, Sintonen H, Koivisto AM, Blom M, Ryynänen OP, Roine RP (2020) Effectiveness of hip or knee replacement surgery in terms of quality-adjusted life years and costs. Acta Orthop 78:108–115 - DOI
-
- Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Zhao K, Kelly M, Bozic KJ (2009) Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:2606–2612 - DOI
-
- Samuel LT, Sultan AA, Rabin JM, Surace PA, Yao B, Moskal JT, Mont MA (2019) Medical malpractice litigation following primary total joint arthroplasty: a comprehensive, nationwide analysis of the past decade. J Arthroplasty 34:S102–S107 - DOI
-
- Patterson DC, Grelsamer R, Bronson MJ, Moucha CS (2017) Lawsuits after primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: a malpractice claims analysis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 25:e235–e242 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous