Quality of hospital discharge letters for patients at the end of life: A retrospective medical record review
- PMID: 34697850
- PMCID: PMC9285046
- DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13524
Quality of hospital discharge letters for patients at the end of life: A retrospective medical record review
Abstract
Objective: For patients who are discharged to go home after a hospitalisation, timely and adequately informing their general practitioner is important for continuity of care, especially at the end of life. We studied the quality of the hospital discharge letter for patients who were hospitalised in their last year of life.
Methods: A retrospective medical record review was performed. Included patients had been admitted to the hospital during the period 1 January to 1 July 2017 and had died within a year after discharge.
Results: Data were collected from records of 108 patients with cancer or other diseases. For 57 patients (53%), the discharge letter included information that related to their limited life expectancy (e.g., agreements about treatment limitations), whereas the patient's limited life expectancy was addressed in the medical record in 76 cases (70%). We found related information in discharge letters for 36 patients (66%) who died <3 months compared to 21 patients (40%) who died 3-12 months after hospitalisation (p < 0.01).
Conclusion: For patients with a limited life expectancy going home after a hospitalisation, one out of two hospital discharge letters lacked any information addressing their limited life expectancy. Specific guidelines for medical information exchange between care settings are needed.
Keywords: cancer; continuity of patient care; end-of-life care; general practitioners; hospital; hospital discharge letter.
© 2021 The Authors. European Journal of Cancer Care published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
The Discharge Communication Study: research protocol for a mixed methods study to investigate and triangulate discharge communication experiences of patients, GPs, and hospital professionals, alongside a corresponding discharge letter sample.BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 11;19(1):825. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4612-1. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019. PMID: 31711500 Free PMC article.
-
Association of admission and patient characteristics with quality of discharge letters: posthoc analysis of a retrospective study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Mar 21;17(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2149-8. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017. PMID: 28327139 Free PMC article.
-
What makes a "successful" or "unsuccessful" discharge letter? Hospital clinician and General Practitioner assessments of the quality of discharge letters.BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr 15;21(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06345-z. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021. PMID: 33858383 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic literature review and narrative synthesis on the risks of medical discharge letters for patients' safety.BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Mar 12;19(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-3989-1. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019. PMID: 30866908 Free PMC article.
-
[Discharge summary--business card of the psychiatric hospital?].Psychiatr Prax. 2000 Jul;27(5):239-42. Psychiatr Prax. 2000. PMID: 10941774 Review. German.
Cited by
-
What helps or hinders the communication of poor prognosis between secondary and primary care? A systematic review with narrative synthesis.Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Dec 26;75(750):e20-e27. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0341. Print 2025 Jan. Br J Gen Pract. 2024. PMID: 38806208 Free PMC article.
-
Quality of cancer treatment care before and after a palliative care pathway: bereaved relatives' perspectives.BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 19;14(e3):e2778-e2787. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004495. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024. PMID: 37973203 Free PMC article.
-
Differences in discharge letter content: oncologists' vs. home care physicians' needs.Support Care Cancer. 2024 Apr 22;32(5):299. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08507-1. Support Care Cancer. 2024. PMID: 38644420
References
-
- Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care . (2012). Safety and quality improvement guide standard 1: Governance for safety and quality in health service Organisations (October 2012). Sydney: ACSQHC
-
- Bekelman, J. E. , Halpern, S. D. , Blankart, C. R. , Bynum, J. P. , Cohen, J. , Fowler, R. , … International Consortium for End‐of‐Life Research (ICELR) . (2016). Comparison of site of death, health care utilization, and hospital expenditures for patients dying with cancer in 7 developed countries. JAMA, 315(3), 272–283. 10.1001/jama.2015.18603 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical