Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan;31(1):e13524.
doi: 10.1111/ecc.13524. Epub 2021 Oct 26.

Quality of hospital discharge letters for patients at the end of life: A retrospective medical record review

Affiliations

Quality of hospital discharge letters for patients at the end of life: A retrospective medical record review

Marijanne Engel et al. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: For patients who are discharged to go home after a hospitalisation, timely and adequately informing their general practitioner is important for continuity of care, especially at the end of life. We studied the quality of the hospital discharge letter for patients who were hospitalised in their last year of life.

Methods: A retrospective medical record review was performed. Included patients had been admitted to the hospital during the period 1 January to 1 July 2017 and had died within a year after discharge.

Results: Data were collected from records of 108 patients with cancer or other diseases. For 57 patients (53%), the discharge letter included information that related to their limited life expectancy (e.g., agreements about treatment limitations), whereas the patient's limited life expectancy was addressed in the medical record in 76 cases (70%). We found related information in discharge letters for 36 patients (66%) who died <3 months compared to 21 patients (40%) who died 3-12 months after hospitalisation (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: For patients with a limited life expectancy going home after a hospitalisation, one out of two hospital discharge letters lacked any information addressing their limited life expectancy. Specific guidelines for medical information exchange between care settings are needed.

Keywords: cancer; continuity of patient care; end-of-life care; general practitioners; hospital; hospital discharge letter.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow chart of inclusion

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care . (2012). Safety and quality improvement guide standard 1: Governance for safety and quality in health service Organisations (October 2012). Sydney: ACSQHC
    1. Bekelman, J. E. , Halpern, S. D. , Blankart, C. R. , Bynum, J. P. , Cohen, J. , Fowler, R. , … International Consortium for End‐of‐Life Research (ICELR) . (2016). Comparison of site of death, health care utilization, and hospital expenditures for patients dying with cancer in 7 developed countries. JAMA, 315(3), 272–283. 10.1001/jama.2015.18603 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berendsen, A. J. , Kuiken, A. , Benneker, W. H. , Meyboom‐de Jong, B. , Voorn, T. B. , & Schuling, J. (2009). How do general practitioners and specialists value their mutual communication? A survey. BMC Health Services Research, 9, 143. 10.1186/1472-6963-9-143 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bernacki, R. E. , Block, S. D. , & American College of Physicians High Value Care Task Force . (2014). Communication about serious illness care goals: A review and synthesis of best practices. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174(12), 1994–2003. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5271 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brinkman‐Stoppelenburg, A. , Rietjens, J. A. , & van der Heide, A. (2014). The effects of advance care planning on end‐of‐life care: A systematic review. Palliative Medicine, 28(8), 1000–1025. 10.1177/0269216314526272 - DOI - PubMed