Effectiveness of interventions that support penicillin allergy assessment and de-labeling of patients by non-allergy specialists: a systematic review protocol
- PMID: 34698707
- DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00075
Effectiveness of interventions that support penicillin allergy assessment and de-labeling of patients by non-allergy specialists: a systematic review protocol
Abstract
Objective: This review will systematically examine and synthesize the evidence evaluating the effectiveness and safety of interventions that enable non-allergy specialist health care workers to assess allergy risk in patients with reported penicillin allergies and subsequently remove erroneous allergy records.
Introduction: The potential benefits of removing erroneous penicillin allergy labels (de-labeling) are wide-ranging. Penicillin allergy assessment and de-labeling is an antibiotic stewardship priority. Delivery of such assessment and de-labeling by non-allergy specialists has been reported in several studies, but the effectiveness and safety have not been formally synthesized. This is a necessary step in the upscaling of penicillin allergy assessment services.
Inclusion criteria: This review will consider quantitative studies using appropriate designs. The studies will include adults and pediatric patients who have undergone penicillin allergy assessment and de-labeling by non-allergy specialists in any health care setting.
Methods: A range of databases will be searched to identify studies published in English, with no date limit applied. Unpublished studies and gray literature will also be searched. Title and abstract screening, and assessment of selected full texts against the inclusion criteria will be conducted by at least two independent reviewers. Identified studies will be assessed for methodological quality using standardized critical appraisal instruments. Data will be extracted and categorized using the EPOC taxonomy, and the effectiveness and safety of the intervention will be determined. Where possible, data will be pooled to facilitate meta-analysis. Data from heterogeneous studies will be reported narratively. The GRADE approach for grading the certainty of evidence will be followed.
Systematic review registration number: PROSPERO CRD42020219044.
Copyright © 2021 JBI.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Comment in
-
Delabelling penicillin allergy revisited.Drug Ther Bull. 2023 Mar;61(3):34. doi: 10.1136/dtb.2022.000068. Drug Ther Bull. 2023. PMID: 36813279 No abstract available.
References
-
- West RM, Smith CJ, Pavitt SH, Butler CC, Howard P, Bates C, et al. ‘Warning: allergic to penicillin’: association between penicillin allergy status in 2.3 million NHS general practice electronic health records, antibiotic prescribing and health outcomes. J Antimicrob Chemother 2019;74 (7):2075–2082.
-
- Powell N, Honeyford K, Sandoe J. Impact of penicillin allergy records on antibiotic costs and length of hospital stay: a single-centre observational retrospective cohort. J Hosp Infect 2020;106 (1):35–42.
-
- Trubiano JA, Smibert O, Douglas A, Devchand M, Lambros B, Holmes, et al. The safety and efficacy of an oral penicillin challenge program in cancer patients: a multicenter pilot study. Open Forum Infect Dis 2018;5 (12):306.
-
- Macy E, Contreras R. Health care use and serious infection prevalence associated with penicillin “allergy” in hospitalized patients: a cohort study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2014;133 (3):790–796.
-
- Blumenthal KG, Shenoy ES, Varughese C, Hurwitz S, Hooper D, Banerji A. Impact of a clinical guideline for prescribing antibiotics to inpatients with reported penicillin or cephalosporin allergies. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2015;135 (2):AB232-AB.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
