Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;30(3):2197-2205.
doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06632-9. Epub 2021 Oct 26.

Minimal clinically important difference in postoperative recovery among patients with gastrointestinal cancer

Tsuyoshi Hara  1 , Eisuke Kogure  2 , Shinno Iijima  3 , Yasuhisa Fukawa  4 , Akira Kubo  5 , Wataru Kakuda  6
Affiliations

Minimal clinically important difference in postoperative recovery among patients with gastrointestinal cancer

Tsuyoshi Hara et al. Support Care Cancer. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) based on patient-reported outcomes is the smallest outcome change sufficiently significant to influence management and is crucial to the design and interpretation of comparative effectiveness trials. The purpose of this study was to estimate the MCID for postoperative recovery metrics in gastrointestinal cancer patients.

Methods: This was a three-institutional cohort study. Participants were 219 patients scheduled for gastrointestinal cancer elective surgery. Body mass index (BMI), isometric knee extension torque (IKET), 6-min walk test (6 MWT), and Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) version 2 were evaluated 1-2 days prior to surgery (baseline) and 4 weeks after surgery. Patients received postoperative rehabilitative care from a physical therapist during hospitalization. The MCID used anchor-based methods. The anchor was a score on the SF-36 physical functioning subscale greater or lower than the average score of the general Japanese population.

Results: The receiver operating curve indicated a cutoff value on the 6 MWT of -7.8 m for clinically relevant decline (area under curve [AUC] = 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.599-0.741) or a 1.5% change. The cutoff value on the SF-36 role-physical subscale was -34.4 for clinically relevant decline (AUC = 0.691, 95% CI = 0.621-0.761) or a 36.6% decrease. No significant correlation was found between changes in BMI, IKET, and anchor.

Conclusion: Plausible MCIDs are present in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. These values can assist the interpretation of clinical trials and observation of the postoperative clinical course of gastrointestinal cancer surgery.

Keywords: Gastrointestinal cancer patients; Minimal clinical important difference; Physical functioning; Postoperative recovery; Rehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Wilson IB, Cleary PD (1995) Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA 273(1):59–65 - DOI
    1. Urbach DR, Harnish JL, Long G (2005) Short-term health-related quality of life after abdominal surgery: a conceptual framework. Surg Innov 12(3):243–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/155335060501200310 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bergman S, Feldman LS, Barkun JS (2006) Evaluating surgical outcomes. Surg Clin North Am 86(1):129–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2005.10.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Urbach DR, Harnish JL, McIlroy JH, Streiner DL (2006) A measure of quality of life after abdominal surgery. Qual Life Res 15(6):1053–1061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-0047-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Quinten C, Coens C, Mauer M, Comte S, Sprangers MA, Cleeland C et al (2009) Baseline quality of life as a prognostic indicator of survival: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from EORTC clinical trials. Lancet Oncol 10(9):865–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70200-1 - DOI - PubMed