Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov;43(6):19-27.
doi: 10.1002/eahr.500107. Epub 2021 Oct 26.

Physician Perspectives on Including Pregnant Women in Covid-19 Clinical Trials: Time for a Paradigm Change

Affiliations

Physician Perspectives on Including Pregnant Women in Covid-19 Clinical Trials: Time for a Paradigm Change

Marie-Julie Trahan et al. Ethics Hum Res. 2021 Nov.

Abstract

Excluding pregnant people from Covid-19 clinical trials may lead to unintended harmful consequences. For this study, an online questionnaire was sent to physicians belonging to Canadian professional medical associations in order to evaluate their perspectives on the participation of pregnant women in Covid-19 clinical trials. The majority of respondents expressed support for including pregnant women in Covid-19 trials (119/165; 72%), especially those investigating therapies with a prior safety record in pregnancy (139/164; 85%). The main perceived barriers to inclusion identified were unwillingness of pregnant patients to participate and of treating teams to offer participation, the burden of regulatory approval, and a general "culture of exclusion" of pregnant women from trials. We describe why some physicians may be reluctant to include pregnant individuals in trials, and we identify barriers to the appropriate participation of pregnant people in clinical research.

Keywords: Covid-19 clinical trials; human subjects research; inclusion of pregnant women in trials; maternal-fetal ethics; pregnant research participants; research with pregnant women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Perspectives and Opinions regarding the Inclusion of Pregnant Women in Covid‐19 Trials

References

    1. Committee on Ethics of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists , “Ethical Considerations for Including Women as Research Participants. Committee Opinion No. 646,” Obstetrics & Gynecology 126 (2015): 1127–28; Shields, K. E., and A. D. Lyerly, “Exclusion of Pregnant Women from Industry‐Sponsored Clinical Trials,” Obstetrics & Gynecology 122 (2013): 1077–81. - PubMed
    1. Cheng, M. P. , et al., “Generating Randomized Trial Evidence to Optimize Treatment in the COVID‐19 Pandemic,” CMAJ 192, no. 15 (2020): E405–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pastick, K. A. , et al., “A Systematic Review of Treatment and Outcomes of Pregnant Women with COVID‐19—a Call for Clinical Trials,” Open Forum Infectious Diseases 7, no. 9 (2020): doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa350. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Malhamé, I. , D'Souza R., and Cheng M. P., “The Moral Imperative to Include Pregnant Women in Clinical Trials of Interventions for COVID‐19,” Annals of Internal Medicine (2020): doi.org/10.7326/M20-3106. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baylis, F. , and Halperin S., “Research Involving Pregnant Women: Trials and Tribulations,” Clinical Investigation 2, no. 2 (2012): 139–46.