Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 26;51(5):288-293.
doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2020.40035.

The Surgeon's Role in Inducing and Controlling Motion Errors During Intraocular Membrane Peeling Procedures

Affiliations

The Surgeon's Role in Inducing and Controlling Motion Errors During Intraocular Membrane Peeling Procedures

Mahmut Doğramacı et al. Turk J Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Objectives: To understand the surgeon's role in inducing and correcting movement inaccuracies during intraocular membrane peeling procedures.

Materials and methods: Optical sensors were used to record movement errors during actuation at the distal tip of 23-gauge pneumatic forceps both when the handle was handheld and when fixed with no human contact. Movements were also recorded at the proximal part of the forceps shaft (near the sclerotomy site) and compared to movement recorded at the distal end. The root mean square (RMS) and range values of the signals obtained from the sensors were calculated before and after applying high (7-13 Hz) and low (<5 Hz) frequency filters.

Results: Comparison of RMS and range values of movement errors at the distal end of the forceps during actuation when the forceps handle was fixed and handheld showed that without human contact, these values were significantly lower in the X axis at all frequencies and in the Z axis at high frequencies compared to handheld (p<0.05), while there were no significant differences in the Y axis. Comparison of values from the distal and proximal ends of the forceps showed that when the forceps were fixed, RMS and range values were significantly higher for movement errors at the distal end compared to the proximal end at all frequencies (p<0.05). There was significant positive correlation between the extent of actuation and the RMS and range values for high-frequency movement errors but not low-frequency errors in all three axes with the fixed pneumatic handle (r=0.21-0.51, p<0.05).

Conclusion: Surgeon- and non-surgeon-related errors are apparent in all axes, but skilled surgeons correct these errors through visual feedback, resulting in better correction in the visible planes. Sclerotomy sites provide a pivoting and stabilizing point for the shaft of the forceps and it is likely that skilled surgeons make use of the sclerotomy point to dampen motion errors, a skill worth teaching to beginners.

Keywords: Vitrectomy; epiretinal membrane; intraocular forceps; macular hole; surgical errors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The system used to record movement errors. 1: Pneumatically powered handle (Constellation pneumatic DSP). 2: Specially designed slot for secure attachment of the handle to the hemisphere that houses the optical sensor, to eliminate surgeon related errors. 3: A plastic hemisphere, housing 3 optical sensors to monitor movements in directions X, Y, and Z. 4: An optical sensor attached to the shaft of the forceps to monitor the extent of actuation. 5: Plastic panels designed to translate movements from the proximal part of the shaft of the forceps, closer to sclerotomy site. 6: Proximal attachment location. 7: Plastic panels designed to translate movements from the distal part of the forceps away from sclerotomy site. 8: Distal attachment location. 9: Optical sensors detecting movement errors in the Y axis. 10: Optical sensors detecting movement in the Z axis. Note optical sensors detecting movements in the X axis are located behind the forceps. 11: The definition of the X, Y, and Z axes in relation to the distal end of the forceps
Figure 2
Figure 2
Movement errors before applying frequency filters detected in the X, Y and Z axes along with actuation extent recorded for pneumatically driven forceps being held by hand but pneumatically actuated by foot pedal

Similar articles

References

    1. Dogramaci M, Williamson TH. Dynamics of epiretinal membrane removal off the retinal surface: a computer simulation project. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97:1202–1207. - PubMed
    1. Henrich PB, Monnier CA, Halfter W, Haritoglou C, Strauss RW, Lim RY, Loparic M. Nanoscale Topographic and Biomechanical Studies of the Human Internal Limiting MembraneNanoscale Studies of the Human ILM. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:2561–2570. - PubMed
    1. Riviere CN, Rader RS, Khosla PK. Characteristics of hand motion of eye surgeons. IEEE. 1997;4:1690–1693.
    1. Dogramaci M, Steel DH. Unintentional movements during the use of vitreoretinal forceps. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018;7:28. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Balicki M, Uneri A, Iordachita I, Handa J, Gehlbach P, Taylor R. Micro-force Sensing in Robot Assisted Membrane Peeling for Vitreoretinal Surgery. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2010;13:303–310. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources