Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 26;11(1):21076.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00629-4.

Identifying early indicators of secondary peritonitis in critically ill patients with cirrhosis

Affiliations

Identifying early indicators of secondary peritonitis in critically ill patients with cirrhosis

Carole Ruault et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Ascitic fluid infection (AFI) is a life-threatening complication of cirrhosis. We aimed to identify early indicators of secondary peritonitis (SP), which requires emergency surgery, and to describe the outcomes of SP and spontaneous bacterial/fungal peritonitis (SBFP). Adults with cirrhosis and AFI admitted to 16 university or university-affiliated ICUs in France between 2002 and 2017 were studied retrospectively. Cases were identified by searching the hospital databases for relevant ICD-10 codes and hospital charts for AFI. Logistic multivariate regression was performed to identify factors associated with SP. Secondary outcomes were short- and long-term mortality and survivors' functional outcomes. Of 178 included patients (137 men and 41 women; mean age, 58 ± 11 years), 21 (11.8%) had SP, confirmed by surgery in 16 cases and by abdominal computed tomography in 5 cases. Time to diagnosis exceeded 24 h in 7/21 patients with SP. By multivariate analysis, factors independently associated with SP were ascitic leukocyte count > 10,000/mm3 (OR 3.70; 95%CI 1.38-9.85; P = 0.009) and absence of laboratory signs of decompensated cirrhosis (OR 4.53; 95%CI 1.30-15.68; P = 0.017). The 1-year mortality rates in patients with SBFP and SP were 81.0% and 77.5%, respectively (Log-rank test, P = 0.92). Patients with SP vs. SBFP had no differences in 1-year functional outcomes. This multicenter retrospective study identified two indicators of SP as opposed to SBFP in patients with cirrhosis. Using these indicators may help to provide early surgical treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan–Meier estimates of overall survival in patients with spontaneous bacterial/fungal peritonitis (SBFP) and secondary peritonitis (SP).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Moon AM, Singal AG, Tapper EB. Contemporary epidemiology of chronic liver disease and cirrhosis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020;18:2650–2666. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.07.060. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gines P, Cardenas A, Arroyo V, Rodes J. Management of cirrhosis and ascites. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004;350:1646–1654. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra035021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rimola A, et al. Diagnosis, treatment and prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: A consensus document International Ascites Club. J. Hepatol. 2000;32:142–153. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(00)80201-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akriviadis EA, Runyon BA. Utility of an algorithm in differentiating spontaneous from secondary bacterial peritonitis. Gastroenterology. 1990;98:127–133. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(90)91300-u. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Runyon BA, Hoefs JC. Ascitic fluid analysis in the differentiation of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis from gastrointestinal tract perforation into ascitic fluid. Hepatology. 1984;4:447–450. doi: 10.1002/hep.1840040316. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms