Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2021 Dec 1;156(12):e215340.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.5340. Epub 2021 Dec 8.

18F-Fludeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Laparoscopy for Staging of Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Dutch Cohort Study (PLASTIC)

Collaborators, Affiliations
Observational Study

18F-Fludeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Laparoscopy for Staging of Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Dutch Cohort Study (PLASTIC)

Emma C Gertsen et al. JAMA Surg. .

Abstract

Importance: The optimal staging for gastric cancer remains a matter of debate.

Objective: To evaluate the value of 18F-fludeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography with computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and staging laparoscopy (SL) in addition to initial staging by means of gastroscopy and CT in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.

Design, setting, and participants: This multicenter prospective, observational cohort study included 394 patients with locally advanced, clinically curable gastric adenocarcinoma (≥cT3 and/or N+, M0 category based on CT) between August 1, 2017, and February 1, 2020.

Exposures: All patients underwent an FDG-PET/CT and/or SL in addition to initial staging.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the number of patients in whom the intent of treatment changed based on the results of these 2 investigations. Secondary outcomes included diagnostic performance, number of incidental findings on FDG-PET/CT, morbidity and mortality after SL, and diagnostic delay.

Results: Of the 394 patients included, 256 (65%) were men and mean (SD) age was 67.6 (10.7) years. A total of 382 patients underwent FDG-PET/CT and 357 underwent SL. Treatment intent changed from curative to palliative in 65 patients (16%) based on the additional FDG-PET/CT and SL findings. FDG-PET/CT detected distant metastases in 12 patients (3%), and SL detected peritoneal or locally nonresectable disease in 73 patients (19%), with an overlap of 7 patients (2%). FDG-PET/CT had a sensitivity of 33% (95% CI, 17%-53%) and specificity of 97% (95% CI, 94%-99%) in detecting distant metastases. Secondary findings on FDG/PET were found in 83 of 382 patients (22%), which led to additional examinations in 65 of 394 patients (16%). Staging laparoscopy resulted in a complication requiring reintervention in 3 patients (0.8%) without postoperative mortality. The mean (SD) diagnostic delay was 19 (14) days.

Conclusions and relevance: This study's findings suggest an apparently limited additional value of FDG-PET/CT; however, SL added considerably to the staging process of locally advanced gastric cancer by detection of peritoneal and nonresectable disease. Therefore, it may be useful to include SL in guidelines for staging advanced gastric cancer, but not FDG-PET/CT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr van Berge Henegouwen reported receiving unrestricted grants from Olympus Pharmaceuticals and Stryker Corp, surgical fees paid to the institution from Alesi Surgical, honoraria paid to the institution for serving as an advisory consultant from B Braun Medical, Mylan, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceuticals, and Medtronic outside the submitted work. Dr Stoot reported serving as faculty in online training course for inguinal hernia repair from Medtronic. Dr Haj Mohammad reported receiving honoraria paid to the institution for serving on the Eli Lilly advisory board, fees paid to the institution for providing lectures and serving on the advisory board from Servier Laboratories and MSD, and fees paid to the institution for serving on the advisory boards from BMS and AstraZeneca outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Flowchart of Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
FDG-PET/CT indicates 18F-fludeoxyglucose–positron emission tomography/computed tomography; PET, positron emission tomography; and SL, staging laparoscopy. acT3 and/or N+, M0 category.

Comment in

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394-424. doi:10.3322/caac.21492 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smyth EC, Verheij M, Allum W, Cunningham D, Cervantes A, Arnold D; ESMO Guidelines Committee . Gastric cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(August)(suppl 5):v38-v49. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdw350 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Integraal Kankercentrum Nederland . Diagnostiek, behandeling en follow-up van het maagcarcinoom 2016. Published 2017. Accessed September 20, 2021. https://richtlijnendatabase.nl/gerelateerde_documenten/f/16316/IKNL%20ri...
    1. Whiting J, Sano T, Saka M, Fukagawa T, Katai H, Sasako M. Follow-up of gastric cancer: a review. Gastric Cancer. 2006;9(2):74-81. doi:10.1007/s10120-006-0360-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Koemans WJ, Luijten JCHBM, van der Kaaij RT, et al. . The metastatic pattern of intestinal and diffuse type gastric carcinoma—a Dutch national cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol. 2020;69:101846. doi:10.1016/j.canep.2020.101846 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances