Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;26(5):1572-1586.
doi: 10.1007/s10461-021-03510-7. Epub 2021 Oct 27.

Barriers to Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Uptake Among Online Male Sex Workers in the US

Affiliations

Barriers to Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Uptake Among Online Male Sex Workers in the US

Anne E Sundelson et al. AIDS Behav. 2022 May.

Abstract

Though barriers to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) have received substantial research attention, less is known about what factors may be affecting PrEP uptake among male sex workers (MSWs), a population at high risk of HIV. This paper presents qualitative findings regarding why a subsample of MSM engaged in exchange sex (receiving money, drugs, shelter, or other goods in exchange for sex) with partners they met on dating/hookup websites and apps had never used PrEP. Analysis revealed several barriers to PrEP uptake including lack of awareness and knowledge about PrEP, scientific and medical concerns, issues related to individual risk perception and beliefs/preferences about risk management, practical and logistical barriers, and provider-level barriers. Nuances to these barriers are discussed, particularly as they relate to the specific type of sex work participants were engaged in. Implications for interventions are also discussed.

Keywords: HIV; Male sex workers; Men who have sex with men; Pre-exposure prophylaxis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest/competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, et al. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(27):2587–2599. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1011205 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Desai K, Sansom SL, Ackers ML, et al. Modeling the impact of HIV chemoprophylaxis strategies among men who have sex with men in the United States: HIV infections prevented and cost-effectiveness. AIDS. 2008;22(14):1829–1839. doi:10.1097/QAD.0b013e32830e00f5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carnegie NB, Goodreau SM, Liu A, et al. Targeting pre-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men in the United States and Peru: partnership types, contact rates, and sexual role. JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;69(1):119–125. doi:10.1097/QAI.0000000000000555 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV Surveillance Report, 2018 (Updated); vol. 31. May 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/library/reports/surveillance/cdc-hiv-surveil.... Accessed April 7, 2021.
    1. Matacotta JJ, Rosales-Perez FJ, Carrillo CM. HIV preexposure prophylaxis and treatment as prevention — beliefs and access barriers in men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women: a systematic review. J Patient-Centered Res Rev. 2020;7(3):265–274. doi:10.17294/2330-0698.1737 - DOI - PMC - PubMed