Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 27;53(1):82.
doi: 10.1186/s12711-021-00672-9.

Genome‑wide association study and genomic prediction for growth traits in yellow-plumage chicken using genotyping-by-sequencing

Affiliations

Genome‑wide association study and genomic prediction for growth traits in yellow-plumage chicken using genotyping-by-sequencing

Ruifei Yang et al. Genet Sel Evol. .

Abstract

Background: Growth traits are of great importance for poultry breeding and production and have been the topic of extensive investigation, with many quantitative trait loci (QTL) detected. However, due to their complex genetic background, few causative genes have been confirmed and the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear, thus limiting our understanding of QTL and their potential use for the genetic improvement of poultry. Therefore, deciphering the genetic architecture is a promising avenue for optimising genomic prediction strategies and exploiting genomic information for commercial breeding. The objectives of this study were to: (1) conduct a genome-wide association study to identify key genetic factors and explore the polygenicity of chicken growth traits; (2) investigate the efficiency of genomic prediction in broilers; and (3) evaluate genomic predictions that harness genomic features.

Results: We identified five significant QTL, including one on chromosome 4 with major effects and four on chromosomes 1, 2, 17, and 27 with minor effects, accounting for 14.5 to 34.1% and 0.2 to 2.6% of the genomic additive genetic variance, respectively, and 23.3 to 46.7% and 0.6 to 4.5% of the observed predictive accuracy of breeding values, respectively. Further analysis showed that the QTL with minor effects collectively had a considerable influence, reflecting the polygenicity of the genetic background. The accuracy of genomic best linear unbiased predictions (BLUP) was improved by 22.0 to 70.3% compared to that of the conventional pedigree-based BLUP model. The genomic feature BLUP model further improved the observed prediction accuracy by 13.8 to 15.2% compared to the genomic BLUP model.

Conclusions: A major QTL and four minor QTL were identified for growth traits; the remaining variance was due to QTL effects that were too small to be detected. The genomic BLUP and genomic feature BLUP models yielded considerably higher prediction accuracy compared to the pedigree-based BLUP model. This study revealed the polygenicity of growth traits in yellow-plumage chickens and demonstrated that the predictive ability can be greatly improved by using genomic information and related features.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Manhattan plots of the genome-wide association study for: (a) 42-day-old weight (DW), (b) 84 DW, (c) average daily gain (ADG), and (d) feed conversion ratio (FCR). Horizontal grey dashed lines indicate the whole-genome significance threshold (P-value = 3.30e−7)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Estimates of additive effects and contributions to heritability of significant SNPs in the QTL region on chromosome 4 for: (a) 42-day-old weight (DW), (b) 84 DW, (c) average daily gain (ADG), and (d) feed conversion ratio (FCR). The highest peak emerged at around 75.89 Mb (blue and red lines); yellow dots represent SNPs with the greatest significance (GGA4_75886144 and GGA4_75890242)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Estimates of the contribution made by the top SNPs to: (a) Heritability and (b) observed prediction accuracy based on the genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model. DW, day-old weight; ADG, average daily gain; FCR, feed conversion ratio

References

    1. International Chicken Genome Sequencing C. Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature. 2004;432:695–716. - PubMed
    1. Park HB, Jacobsson L, Wahlberg P, Siegel PB, Andersson L. QTL analysis of body composition and metabolic traits in an intercross between chicken lines divergently selected for growth. Physiol Genomics. 2006;25:216–223. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00113.2005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Johansson AM, Pettersson ME, Siegel PB, Carlborg O. Genome-wide effects of long-term divergent selection. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:e1001188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001188. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sheng Z, Pettersson ME, Honaker CF, Siegel PB, Carlborg O. Standing genetic variation as a major contributor to adaptation in the Virginia chicken lines selection experiment. Genome Biol. 2015;16:219. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0785-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zan Y, Sheng Z, Lillie M, Ronnegard L, Honaker CF, Siegel PB, et al. Artificial selection response due to polygenic adaptation from a multilocus. Multiallelic Genetic Architecture Mol Biol Evol. 2017;34:2678–2689. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx194. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources