Long-term Outcomes of Non-syndromic and Syndromic Craniosynostosis: Analysis of Demographic, Morphologic, and Surgical Factors
- PMID: 34707067
- PMCID: PMC8841231
- DOI: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2021-0101
Long-term Outcomes of Non-syndromic and Syndromic Craniosynostosis: Analysis of Demographic, Morphologic, and Surgical Factors
Abstract
In this study, we analyzed the outcomes of patients (followed for 5-38 years, average 17.3 years) with craniosynostosis and evaluated their long-term prognosis. In all, 51 patients who underwent surgery for craniosynostosis between 1982 and 2015, including 12 syndromic and 39 non-syndromic cases, were included. The average age at the initial surgery was significantly lower in the syndromic group than that in the non-syndromic group (9.8 months old vs. 19.9 months, respectively). The surgical procedures did not significantly differ between the two groups, but repeat surgery was significantly more common in the syndromic group than in the non-syndromic group (4 children [30.8%] and 3 children [7.7%], respectively). The children requiring repeat surgery tended to be younger at the initial surgery than those who did not. Those patients who required repeat surgery did not have significantly different surgical procedures initially. The incidence of developmental retardation was 49.0% (43.5% in the non-syndromic group and 66.7% in the syndromic group), and only two children in the non-syndromic group displayed recovery. This study is the first to analyze the prognosis for patients who were followed for at least 5 years after cranioplasty. Repeat surgery was common, especially in syndromic patients. Severity of skull deformity and early initial surgery may be important factors determining the need for repeat surgery. Developmental retardation was also common, and improvement was rare even after surgery.
Keywords: craniosynostosis; long-term outcome; non-syndromic; syndromic.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.
Figures
References
-
- Boulet SL, Rasmussen SA, Honein MA: A population- based study of craniosynostosis in metropolitan Atlanta, 1989-2003. Am J Med Genet A 146A: 984–991, 2008 - PubMed
-
- Kweldam CF, van der Vlugt JJ, van der Meulen JJ: The incidence of craniosynostosis in the Netherlands, 1997-2007. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64: 583–588, 2011 - PubMed
-
- Neusel C, Class D, Eckert AW, et al. : Multicentre approach to epidemiological aspects of craniosynostosis in Germany. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56: 881–886, 2018 - PubMed
-
- Tønne E, Due-Tønnessen BJ, Wiig U, et al. : Epidemiology of craniosynostosis in Norway. J Neurosurg Pediatr 26: 1–8, 2020 - PubMed
-
- Cornelissen M, Ottelander Bd, Rizopoulos D, et al. : Increase of prevalence of craniosynostosis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 44: 1273–1279, 2016 - PubMed
