Two sexes respond equally to food restriction in a sexually dimorphic but not body mass dimorphic jumping spider
- PMID: 34707837
- PMCID: PMC8525090
- DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8112
Two sexes respond equally to food restriction in a sexually dimorphic but not body mass dimorphic jumping spider
Abstract
Natural selection favors animals that evolve developmental and behavioral responses that buffer the negative effects of food restrictions. These buffering responses vary both between species and within species. Many studies have shown sex-specific responses to environmental changes, usually in species with sexual size dimorphism (SSD), less found in species with weak or no SSD, which suggests that sizes of different sexes are experiencing different selections. However, previous studies usually investigated development and behavior separately, and the balanced situation where males and females of sexually dimorphic species respond in the same way to food restriction remains little known. Here, we investigated this in Phintelloides versicolor (Salticidae) that presents sexual dimorphism in color and shape but weak SSD. We examined whether food restriction induced the same responses in males and females in development duration, adult body size and weight, daily time allocated to foraging, and hunting. We found food restriction induced similar responses in both sexes: both exhibited longer development duration, smaller adult body size and weight, higher probability of staying outside nests and noticing prey immediately, and higher hunting success. However, there were sexual differences regardless of food condition: females showed faster development, smaller adult body size, higher probability of staying outside of nests, and higher hunting success. These indicated the differential selection on male and female sizes of P. versicolor could be under a balanced situation, where males and females show equal developmental and behavioral plasticity to environmental constraints.
Keywords: fecundity selection; life history traits; sex role; sexual difference; sex‐specific response.
© 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Figures




References
-
- Abrams, P. A. (1991). Life history and the relationship between food availability and foraging effort. Ecology, 72(4), 1242–1252. 10.2307/1941098 - DOI
-
- Aguilar‐Argüello, S. O. , & García‐Chávez, J. H. (2015). Importance of hunger and prey type on predatory behavior stages in Corythalia albicincta (Araneae: Salticidae). Journal of Arachnology, 43(2), 143–151. 10.1636/j13-56 - DOI
-
- Bates, D. , Mächler, M. , Bolker, B. , & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed‐effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 - DOI
-
- Berrigan, D. , & Charnov, E. L. (1994). Reaction norms for age and size at maturity in response to temperature: A puzzle for life historians. Oikos, 70(3), 474–478. 10.2307/3545787 - DOI
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources