Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Oct 11:11:662055.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.662055. eCollection 2021.

Targeting BRCA and DNA Damage Repair Genes in GI Cancers: Pathophysiology and Clinical Perspectives

Affiliations
Review

Targeting BRCA and DNA Damage Repair Genes in GI Cancers: Pathophysiology and Clinical Perspectives

Kai Zimmer et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Mutated germline alleles in the DNA damage repair (DDR) genes "breast cancer gene 1" (BRCA1) and BRCA2 have originally been identified as major susceptibility genes in breast and ovarian cancers. With the establishment and approval of more cost-effective gene sequencing methods, germline and somatic BRCA mutations have been detected in several cancers. Since the approval of poly (ADP)-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) for BRCA-mutated cancers, BRCA mutations gained rising therapeutic implications. The impact and significance of BRCA mutations have been evaluated extensively in the last decades. Moreover, other genes involved in the DDR pathway, such as ATM, ATR, or CHK1, have emerged as potential new treatment targets, as inhibitors of these proteins are currently under clinical investigation. This review gives a concise overview on the emerging clinical implications of mutations in the DDR genes in gastrointestinal cancers with a focus on BRCA mutations.

Keywords: BRCA; DNA damage repair; PARP inhibitors (PARPi); gastrointenstinal cancer; molecular profiling; precision oncology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
DNA damage repair pathways and drug targets. (A) Several internal and external stressors such as ionizing radiation, replication stress, ROS, or chemical stress can lead to DNA double-strand breaks (DNA DSBs). Depending on cell cycle progression and the availability of a template strand, either the nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) or the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway are the mechanism of choice for DNA repair. In the NHEJ pathway, DNA damage is recognized by the “DNA-dependent protein kinase” (DNA-PK), a nuclear serine/threonine protein kinase complex, composed of a large catalytic subunit named DNA-PKcs and a heterodimer of Ku proteins (Ku70/80). Then, the nuclease Artemis is activated and cleaves 5′- and 3′-DNA overhangs. In HRR, which only occurs in the S and the G2 phase of the cell cycle, a protein complex termed MRN (which is composed of MRE11, Rad50, and Nbs1) recognizes DNA DSBs. After its activation by phosphorylation, the ATM kinase works as a master effector protein for HRR by activating several downstream effectors such as the CHK1 or the CHK2 kinase or the BRCA1 protein, having effects on cell cycle progression via p53 control or CDK1 inhibition. Stalled replication forks lead to an arrest of DNA replication and such replication stress could lead to DNA DSBs. To prevent this and to stop cell cycle progression, the ATR protein kinase is recruited and binds to its partner protein ATRIP. Cell cycle regulation and repair mechanisms are then controlled via CHK1 activation. Repair of DNA single-strand breaks (SSBs) is initiated by PARP enzymes. (B) In HRR, the MRE protein acts as a nuclease and resects the broken DNA ends, which results in the overhanging of single-stranded 3′-ends. Protection from further resection or modification of ssDNA is reached by the binding of the RPA protein. RAD51 is essential for HRR, as it facilitates DNA unwinding, stretching, and invasion into the template strand. To prevent its early polymerization on DNA, RAD51 proteins are kept inactive by binding to BRCA2, which is recruited to the broken DNA in a complex with BRCA1 and the linker protein PALB2 after detection of DNA damage. The RAD51-DNA filament is then capable of invading the template strand. (C) The RAD51-DNA filament invades the template strand and searches for extended homologous regions, which are then stabilized by base pairing. RAD51 disassembles and leaves a heteroduplex of the defective DNA strand and the template strand. The invading strand is extended by a DNA polymerase, and after elongation, the newly synthesized strand segment is displaced and finally ligated with its original strand endings. This figure was created using the BioRender.com online tool.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ford D, Easton DF, Peto J. Estimates of the Gene Frequency of BRCA1 and Its Contribution to Breast and Ovarian Cancer Incidence. Am J Hum Genet (1995) 57(6):1457–62. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Whittemore AS, Gong G, John EM, McGuire V, Li FP, Ostrow KL, et al. . Prevalence of BRCA1 Mutation Carriers Among U.S. Non-Hispanic Whites. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2004) 13(12):2078–83. - PubMed
    1. Antoniou A, Pharoah PD, Narod S, Risch HA, Eyfjord JE, Hopper JL, et al. . Average Risks of Breast and Ovarian Cancer Associated With BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutations Detected in Case Series Unselected for Family History: A Combined Analysis of 22 Studies. Am J Hum Genet (2003) 72(5):1117–30. doi: 10.1086/375033 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kuchenbaecker KB, Hopper JL, Barnes DR, Phillips KA, Mooij TM, Roos-Blom MJ, et al. . Risks of Breast, Ovarian, and Contralateral Breast Cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers. JAMA (2017) 317(23):2402–16. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7112 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen S, Parmigiani G. Meta-Analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Penetrance. J Clin Oncol (2007) 25(11):1329–33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.1066 - DOI - PMC - PubMed